Jeff—Saturday
Today I’m blogging about a topic somewhat off my usual
Saturday beat. It’s all about the craft
of writing, and is triggered by a good time experience I had on Thursday. I don’t know how many of you are aware the
Kendall & Cooper Talk Mysteries podcast series, co-hosted by writers Julie
Cooper and Wendy Kendall. I met Julie last January at a book signing in
Seattle, and she kindly asked if I’d be willing to participate in one of their
podcasts. Having heard good things about the dynamic duo, I immediately said
yes.
The earliest date we could schedule was April 12th
and so I put it out of my mind and went off to the land of shoulder
surgery. A week ago I received their
proposed questions.
Little had I realized how thorough would be the grilling I’d
receive at their hands.:) Or how I’d best be prepared to bring my A-game to the
party. Kendall & Cooper had
thoroughly prepared, and their attention to detail made me do the same, leading
me to think about our craft in a way I hadn’t since my “teaching days.”
Though much of our interview focused on my books I shall
spare you those portions, and only repeat what I think would be of more general
interest. But for those of you
interested in hearing the podcast, or any of their many others, here are links:
YOUTUBE,
Now on to Showtime.
K&C QUESTION: You’ve also taught mystery writing, a
topic near and dear to both Wendy and my hearts, at Washington & Jefferson
College. Any tips you’d offer to listeners who want to get started on mystery
writing?
JMS ANSWER: There are
technical elements to mystery writing, such as creating an inciting incident
that grabs the reader early on, and there are many fine texts out there
touching on those points. But to me,
above all else, success depends on one thing: sitting in the chair and doing
the writing day in and day out. Period. It doesn’t matter if it’s a carefully
thought out email, a blog or a letter, but it has to be something that gets
your creative juices flowing.
You’re not going to write the Great American novel in one
sitting, not in a week, a month or even a year. You’re most likely not to even
going to do it in one book or two. But if you sit down every day and write,
you’ll find your unique voice, and once you do, a bit of alchemy takes over and
you’ll magically find words turning into stories, and you into a mystery
writer. As to whether you’ll make a
living at it, that’s another story.
K & C QUESTION: Your villainous characters live their
lives through their own sort of moral code that they’ve twisted from their
personal histories. Often their thoughts
on their moral codes sound so innocent, but when their correlating actions are
shown, the reader sees a darker side…What is your purpose as an author in showing
the inner thoughts that make up a villain?
JMS ANSWER: People aren’t ciphers, one interchangeable
with another. They have mindsets and
reasoning which may make no sense to us, but makes absolute sense to them. Decades
ago I served as special counsel to the New York City Board of Correction, and
in that capacity I interacted with a host of inmates accused of horrific
crimes, of which many seemed perfectly logical and reasonable people. I also
have a friend who was essentially in charge of psychiatric services for a major
US state, and he once told me that 30% of the people out there walking the
streets should be institutionalized, another 30% are in need of serious
medication, and of the remaining 40%, half of them aren’t going to like you
anyway.
Even assuming my
friend’s figures are somewhat overstated, you still have a world filled with
minds thinking in ways foreign to what we consider societal norms, and getting
into their heads I see as far more interesting and instructive than simply
offering an empirical presentation of their observable conduct.
K & C QUESTION: You write your mysteries through several
different characters’ points of view. What are the challenges of switching
points of view through your books, and what are the advantages?
JMS ANSWER: The
obvious cop-out answer is that it’s all a matter of what you’re trying to
achieve. If it’s a full-fledged, first person, one character point of view,
everything must be experienced directly by that character in real time. That heightens immediacy, but limits
perspective. If several characters get into the act with their points of view,
you broaden the base of the story and increase the complexities, but run the
risk of distracting the reader from the primary plot line.
Capable writers can handle both scenarios quite well, and I
frankly see no real downside to either method—with one exception: It drives me
crazy when points of view shift within the same scene. To me that’s a no-no. It simply puts readers
off their game.
K & C QUESTION: Portraying a diversity of families
without confusing the reader and without weakening the pacing of the story is a
real strength in writing. Can you talk a
little about how you reveal in your writing the strengths and weaknesses in
different family relationships?
JMS ANSWER: I’m
tempted to say it’s simply a matter of accepting Tolstoy’s observation that, “All happy families are alike; each unhappy
family is unhappy in its own way,” but I shall resist that temptation. Frankly, I think writing about familial
strengths and weaknesses—something I consider very important in my work—is
actually a matter of allowing your characters to express themselves about their
relationships. After all, they write my books, I’m just along for the typing.
Yes, they surely know I have some broad concept in mind for how I’d like them
to behave, but often they just push my thoughts aside and take charge of their own
lives. For sure, what develops comes
from some deep dark mysterious part of my own being, but my characters are the
ones tapping into that place, not me.
Now for the big finish…
K & C QUESTION:
Jeff, can you tell us about the “Murder is Everywhere” blogsite that you
share with 9 other diverse mystery writers spread across the world?
JMS ANSWER: Murder is Everywhere came into existence out of
Bouchercon 2009, when the late great Leighton Gage brought together six
renowned mystery writers from around the world in a blog site dedicated to
international mystery writing. I later joined as the seventh member. Every day MIE offers fresh, thoughtful,
eclectic, posts—often with insider info—about the international venues where we
place our work. Rarely, though, do we write about our books. That would get
very old very quickly. Our current crew includes original MIE members Cara
Black (Paris) and Michael Stanley (Michael Sears and Stan Trollip—Southern
Africa), plus Leye Adenle (Nigeria and London), Annamaria Alfieri (South
America and Southern Africa), Sujata Massey (India and Japan), Caro Ramsay (Scotland),
Zoë Sharp (no fixed abode), and Susan Spann (Japan).
That’s all folks!
—Jeff
Thanks, Jeff. Interesting perspectives, and I'll certainly watch the YouTube also. As you know, Murder Is Everywehere just passed 3.5 million hits. That can't all be the ten of us! And it's great fun to write and read this group of characters.
ReplyDeleteBased on your statistics, I should only like two of you. But mystery writers are obviously the exception.
It's amazing, isn't it Michael, how much the reach of Murder is Everywhere has increased since its "early days." In part that may be because even the "sixty-percenters" have found kindred content here.
ReplyDeleteHmm, that gets me to thinking of a new parlor game. If we count you and Stan as two, where would the ten of us fall within my friend's mental health statistical profile? On second thought, sticking to cribbage might be a better idea. :)
My brother, I the resident cockeyed optimist must take exception to those dreary statistics. My reading of this post suggests that your friend's worldview may very well be skewed by the kinds of people he necessarily meets on a daily basis in his job. And you were used to hang about in prisons as part of your job. These are situations that would profoundly influence the sample of humanity you both encountered, giving you a rather pessimistic picture of humanity.
ReplyDeleteIf I were to base my assessment of human intelligence going by my blogmates here on MIE, I would imagine that the mean IQ of the world population was at least 130. But that is two standard deviations above the mean. Not even my rosiest colored glasses would convince me that all the world is as intelligent as my friends.
LUCKY me!
Sis, I'm really impressed at how you've been able to put your feelings about recent elections results behind you, and now have a more positive view of those out there about you. :)
ReplyDeleteBro, I have not put them behind me. I merely look beyond today, especially at the splendid younger generation coming along. Wretched as I might feel about where we are and how we look to the world at this moment, I have hope. Lots of it. My life has taught me to be incredibly hopeful--personally and politically.
DeleteIf you had asked me twenty years ago if I would live to see the first black president, I would have said no, not a chance. If you had asked me if I would live to see gay marriage legal all over the US, even in Alabama, I would have laughed at your asking the question. Yet these things have happened. To my joy!
Or am I being too political for you?
You're being ZEN, not political. :)
DeleteThanks very much, Jeff. I enjoy your books so much, and am continuing with reading your newest An Aegean April. Recording your episode was a delight and I learned things I can apply as I'm writing my own mystery. Discovering this Murder Is Everywhere blog was my unexpected delight and I'm now an avid fan. Best wishes
ReplyDeleteThank you, Wendy. It was a delight, and I'm only happy that I was able to return your graciously introducing me to K&C Talk Mysteries, by bringing you and Julie into our MIE family!
DeleteGreat interview Jeff! I absolutely agree with you about the importance of keeping the butt in the chair - and I loved your perspective on villains too. It's always great to hear how other writers approach the craft. (I'm going to go listen to the podcast too!)
ReplyDeleteAlso, thanks for the shout-out about MIE!
Thanks, Susan. They truly asked me questions that made me think...a novel experience these days. :)
DeleteVery interesting.
ReplyDeleteThis post reminded me how much I miss Leighton Gage's illuminating posts about Brazil, things I would never have known otherwise. Such a contribution!
I also am optimistic due to the movement of young people on so many issues all over the country. And now the movement of underpaid teachers in vastly unsupported school systems.
Even lawyers with Legal Aid who represent immigrants have staged protests against deportations. Women activists out there, too.
So there's where my optimism comes from.
There’s no reason not to be optimistic— just as long as it doesn’t lead to complacency.
DeleteDon't worry. No warning needed. The optimists who are weighing in here are anything but complacent. In fact, as Kathy said, it's the activism of the young that encourages optimism these days. If mine ever lags, all I will have to do is look to them.
DeleteMost enjoyable read and good words of advice for all of us who sit at the keyboard regularly painting word pictures.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Jackie. Much appreciated coming from you who paints such lovely word images of so many picture perfect places!
DeleteDon't worry. Everyone I know is not complacent. Even those who can't be activists any more are railing at the TV news, making donations, talking to people.
ReplyDeleteI'm in a state of shock as I found out a nice neighbor voted for the current White House resident. Why? I asked. She thought he'd stand up to the NRA. However, she ended up taking her family to the March for our Lives march in NYC upon realizing that wouldn't happen.
Now, another Trump voter moved in above me. I took out my pro-immigration button and started wearing it again. And I found other button I'll wear.
Meanwhile, I watch the political comedians who are on target and TV news all day and support friends who can march and contribute by writing and donating.
Go for it, Kathy! Stand up for what you believe in. Bravo.
ReplyDelete