—Jeff
A few weeks ago Jeff wrote about an
elderly couple on Mykonos being hassled by a rent-a-cop, for allegedly
trespassing a private sightline because they were looking at the sea, over a
privately owned seawall.
Ha.
For the past forty years, people
attempting to walk or sit on public beaches in Malibu have been hassled by
wealthy beachfront homeowners and their rent-a-cops, some of whom are motorized
infantry.
Malibu Private Patrol |
Which is, what's the word, illegal.
And we're not even talking about giving
the public access to the whole width of the beach. By law, the easements for
these shoreline properties give the homeowners privacy rights on the sand above
the high tide line. The rabble—anybody who can't afford to shell out twenty,
thirty, forty million or more to build a weekend getaway—are only entitled to
sully the damp part of the beach. Yet for many Malibu homeowners that's an
intolerable intrusion, even if it is, what's the word, legal.
Tide Lines |
Plus which many of those same building
permits require homeowners to provide access from the road out front—the
Pacific Coast Highway—to the beaches. But a significant number have ignored
that requirement. Most famously, multimedia mogul David Geffen.
He signed an agreement in 1983 to build a
vertical easement—an accessway to the beach—in exchange for a permit to build a
swimming pool. After the pool was completed Geffen filed a lawsuit challenging
the requirement.
A mere twenty-two years of bad publicity
later, Geffen backed down; the gates to the accessway were opened in 2005. Part
of the bad publicity had been a series of Doonesbury comic strips, in which the
resident stoner/surfer Zonker participated in demonstrations to liberate the
beaches (below the high tide line). When the matter was finally resolved, this
victory strip appeared:
Zonker-Malibu |
Later, in real life, a beach accessway
near the Malibu Pier was consecrated in Zonk's fictional honor.
Zonker Map |
Geffen, though, is hardly alone in his
attempts to assert sovereignty over a slice of the Pacific shore. California
Coastal Commission guidelines call for an accessway every 1000 feet. In Malibu,
that works out to 105 passages. Right now there are 17. Since 1973, homeowners
have signed 29 agreements to provide vertical easements on their property. Nine
have opened. Twenty remain neck-deep in lawsuit quicksand.
But wait, there's more. Various
beachfront residents, even some whose properties contain vertical easements, try
to make using them as difficult as possible, through a combination of locked
gates, camouflage and mendacity. Not just about the beach access, but about
public parking spaces that have mysteriously sprouted NO PARKING signs, or been
barricaded by orange traffic cones like those used by road crews. And my
favorite: fake driveways, to fool motorists into thinking that parking in front
of them is verboten.
Malibu Scams |
But this summer a digital Joan of Arc has
ridden to the rescue. Or as the locals know her, Jenny of Venice. Well,
originally of St. Louis.
Jenny Price is an environmental
scholar/journalist (she has something called a PhD, from someplace called
Yale), who's written extensively about Malibu Beach Imperialism. And now she's
become a political apptivist.
Jenny Price |
She joined forces with a firm called
Escape Apps. They mounted a Kickstarter campaign that raised thirty thousand
dollars, which they're using to create Our
Malibu Beaches, an app that will be given away free all this summer.
Our Malibu Beaches is a guide to all the
legal ways to get to the legally public beach—and a guide to all the illegal
scams which can be legally ignored.
So if you're going to San Francisco be
sure to wear a flower in your hair, and bring a fully loaded wallet, that town
is pricey. If you're going to Los
Angeles be sure to load Jenny's Malibu beach app in your phone, if
you're in the mood to insert yourself into some billionaire's vertical
easement.
--Lenny
Boo, hiss! Shame on them! I will have to check out your book. Sounds good.
ReplyDeleteLil--
ReplyDeleteBless you. I'm gonna have to sell a ton of books to break even on what Jeff charged me to write that intro.
--Lenny
Maybe it would help the unwanted rabble make their point if everyone who wants access avoids contributing to his billions. I went to Wikipedia, the source of all knowledge, and learned that his career and his money is based on a lie. Says a lot about his character. Says a lot about his god-complex. Says a lot about Jenny Price who was willing to challenge Geffen, apparently a first in his life.
ReplyDeleteNow, I move on to the really important stuff. If laughter is the best medicine, everyone who has read Lenny Kleinfeld's SHOOTERS AND CHASERS has added years to their lives. I read it in 2009 and it is still the funniest book I have read. The previous winner of that award is Jimmy Breslin's 1969 masterpiece, the "THE GANG WHO COULDN'T SHOOT STRAIGHT". (This book also deserves a look if you are a fan of THE GODFATHER. I was teaching in an Italian neighborhood when I read the Breslin book and THE GODFATHER. An Amazon reviewer describes Breslin's characters as having the IQ of Fredo. Kleinfeld's characters aren't even that far up the chart. Neither are the real life gangsters). SHOOTERS AND CHASERS should only be read in public if you don't mind people edging away from the crazy person reading the book in the mystery and thriller section.
Beth
Beth--
ReplyDeleteThank you, yet again, for the kind words.
As far as Geffen, he's not the embodiment of pure evil, just the embodiment of pure entitlement; a trait he shares with many of his peers. But he has also built careers for a lot of talented people, and run companies that kept a lot of other people working.
As far as the lying, well, that's the main language spoken out here. Expecting honesty from a showbiz exec is like expecting honesty from a congressman or a used car salesman; it happens, but it's a scientific anomaly.
My favorite personal example: I once pointed out to a producer he'd told me a whopper. He got huffy and indignantly informed me the miscommunication was all my fault, because I should have assumed he was lying.
And don't forget those who ended up with Gold Rolexes.
DeleteThese days that could be a middle-aged TV network exec or a 19-year-old USC undergrad who's the offspring of a Communist Chinese government official, and who might, a decade from now, be purchasing that TV network.
ReplyDelete