Is technology making us stupid?
Well more stupid? Not a day goes past without reading something that says
Google is making us daft and the amount of social networking that goes on means
that we have forgotten how to talk to friends.
We would rather chat to somebody invisible on the other side of the
world that we don’t know rather than nip round for a coffee. Go into any
restaurant and watch couples out for a
meal together, not speaking just scrolling through their phones as if there
might be something more interesting going on there.
I grew up in a house without a
phone. How on earth did we survive? I can count on the fingers of one hand the
times we really needed a phone- a quick sprint to old Mrs Jefferies and run the
gauntlet of her vicious budgie Polly- or Dad was sent out on his bike to the
nearest phone box.
People were better organised in
those days, you kept to a timetable in your life. Gran always expected us to appear at her door
at two o’clock on a Sunday and we went swimming on a Monday night. Mum worked
late on a Thursday and that was the
night we got our weekly bar of chocolate ( Fry’s chocolate cream). Nowadays people phone each other from inside
Walmart/Asda and say ‘I’m at the fish I, meet you at the bananas in five
minutes.’ Don’t get me started with
people who walk around Walmart/Asda in their pyjamas.why?
Don’t get me started ( or started
again as I’ve not stopped yet) on folk who walk dogs … well the dogs run around
and the owner stands in the path on their phone, talking crap….
This condition, the angst of what
technology might be doing to us could be
referred to as ‘neuro anxiety’. Folk like me struggle with new gadgets and like
to take solace in the argument that it’s not good for us. However, in 370 BC Plato used the same
argument saying that the concept of the written word was dangerous because
people would stop using their memories.
So let’s look at a few examples.
Goldfish are now thought to
possess a rather impressive nine second attention span but before we feel smug
about that, the incessant bombardment of information and the need for instant answers
has seriously impacted our ability to focus.
We now have an attention span less than a goldfish.And that’s official.He may be as bright as his shiny scales.
Eight seconds.
And getting shorter. Microsoft proved that in a 2015 study using
electro encephalograms. I can understand
how they manage that experiment on their Canadian human subjects but how do they manage that on goldfish? I
was then wondering if a Canadian on a
mobile phone or a goldfish has a better chance of following the plot of
Midsummer Murders.
In last week's episode, the victim was killed by cricket balls
being fired from a bowling machine. The best use of a cricket
ball I have ever seen.
In last week's episode, the victim was killed by cricket balls
being fired from a bowling machine. The best use of a cricket
ball I have ever seen.
In the US, the centre of disease
prevention has shown that the percentage of children with ADHD has more than
doubled since 1990. I suppose a rubber
stamp on the report card might be in order. ‘They are easily distracted, must
pay more attention.’ I got that a lot at
school, I didn’t have SDHD just some boring teachers….so the smart money might
be on the fact that technology might be responsible for this.
It’s also possible that gaming
activates the nucleus accumbens in the brain, the pleasure producing dopamine
centre. Men are now dying after excessive
bouts of gaming. They don’t eat, they
don’t sleep they just game away and die
of dehydration. Their brains on post
mortem show similar signs to any other addiction.
The key word in the above
paragraph is ‘men.’ Couldn’t find any reference
anywhere to female fatality while gaming.
So these men who game for days on end, have they ever met or had any
physical contact with a lady person? Any person? Even a Canadian with a short
attention span?
More interestingly German neuro
scientist Manfred Sptizer has pointed out that with numbers and facts and map
routes only a touch away, the human race is heading for ‘digital dementia’. There is a lack of true interaction with the
subject concerned and that affects the memory. I recall Hugh Laurie saying that while filming House, he was a medical expert
on something for 30 minutes, then he
couldn’t remember a thing once the director had called ‘cut’. I do wonder about
people attending concerts and filming it on their phone (and indeed watching
the filming) instead of watching what they are filming - the show.
And that is a different interactive experience. However, on the positive side, it can be relaxing and comforting to know that all that
other stuff, all that mundane detritus of life that nobody can be bothered
remembering, is safely stored away in
a digital recording, ready to ping when
it needs to be brought to your attention.
Aha! Who do we have here??
Facebook however, while I am sure
it does work for some people, has a lot of negatives attached. One case study shows that Facebooking between
mother and daughter produces the stress hormone cortisol whereas face to face
reaction between the two produce the feel good hormone oxytocin. And for
mankind there has always been a reaction for a child to turn its head towards a
returning parent. That is now starting
to change with children fixed on their phone or their tablet instead of looking
up when somebody enters the living room. ( good for a plot if you think
about it to a deadly, Hammer horror type of conclusion). That fascination with tablets etc, and the rise of Facebook could be leading to
the human race losing their ability to face read signals, those little nuances
of stress and anxiety, secondary information on how the news you are giving is
being perceived and the early signal that
it might be better to change tack or rephrase before someone bursts into
tears or you get a slap in the kisser.Aha! Who do we have here??
More interesting to us is maybe,
is the Norwegian experiment which proved
something I guess all authors know – that reading off a screen is a very
different experience to reading off paper.
The brain interprets the information differently. Reading a good old fashioned novel, the
reader absorbs it and sees the word on the page as somebody would looking at an
old fashioned map. The shaping of the
word and the lettering is important and it feeds to a very deep understanding
of the text being displayed. The brain
takes time to soak it all up, and retain it. How often has an editor said ‘that
paragraph is too dense and too bulky’, ‘the dialogue is too sparse.’ Not only
is it not reading right, it doesn’t look right.
People who read digitally skim read, their eyes tend to hunt for key
words and can very often miss the deeper, more subtle meaning of what the
writer is trying to convey.
So in case this blog is too subtle because you are reading it on screen,
I will summarise.
Men who spend all their money and
time gaming are less intelligent than goldfish. This also applies to Canadians. ( Just to be clear, I mean that rule also applies to Canadians not that Canadians are less intelligent than goldfish!!)
Women who need a feel-good hormone should stay
away from their laptop, eat chocolate and roll up on the settee with a furry
dog and a good book (not on Kindle).
That should provide all the endorphins needed. If you want to add a wee bit of adrenaline
into the mix – read a crime novel.Here's one being published in February....
Why'd you have to ramble on so? Couldn't you have just started and stopped with the last two paragraphs? Sheesh. I've got other web pages to browse, too, you know...
ReplyDeleteWhy does that not surprise me Evka? Do you live in the upper bit of America, you know, up there near the Canadian border?
DeleteAnd what's wrong with that, eh? Wait... what were we talking about? Just a sec, my phone is chirping at me...
DeleteAs someone who regularly lectures to first year students, I'm not at all surprised by the goldfish comparison. Now if only I can persuade goldfish to write the exams...
ReplyDeleteDo you allow your students to have their mobiles on the desk while you lecture? That is a constant battle in schools here. And what can be so important that it can't wait an hour?
DeleteWell, I get upset if they ring...
DeleteI'm so glad crime thrillers still manage to hold our attention :-) Looking forward to February now.
ReplyDeleteEvery home, every conference room, every classroom needs a gadget box--something my daughter and son-in-law enforce at mealtimes. Everybody in attendance puts their gadgets into a box that is put away until the event--meal, class, meeting--is over.
ReplyDeleteA friends was disgusted with her friends around the restaurant table constantly checking their phones. So she challenged them to follow a rule: the first one to take out a phone pays the entire bill. It worked.
That sounds like a great idea, Annamaria! Reminds me of a sailing trip where the first person to complain about the food had to take over the cooking.
DeleteThings definitely read differently on the page to the screen. I always have to print out a paper version to read through once I've finished a manuscript. A different font helps, too.
Congrats on the new book, Caro. Intriguing cover!
I can't remember what you wrote in the blog above, but I know it must have been as insightful as always. Congrats on your new book, which certainly doesn't describe you. Cheers!
ReplyDeleteFrom recent events, I think the 9-second attention span is tied more to the orange color of the bearer, be it goldfish scales or mammal hair.
ReplyDelete