Obviously growing up on the Clydeside, boats and boat
building are in my blood. Billy Connolly is telling the truth when he said that
schools just opened their doors and the kids walked out of the classroom and
into the shipyards. As I was growing up my mum and dad, all 3 uncles (and the
aunties they were married on to) were all employed somewhere along the line of
the building of the huge ships.
There were great stories about the houses never got any
direct sunshine for a couple of years once the hull of the liners got beyond a
certain height. These boats where monstrosities that cast huge shadows. The day
after launch it was as if they had never been and the sun shone again ( well
not on the Clyde obviously !! It was
probably less dark). Stories of boats being launched and their drag chains not
being enough to hold them so the boat went diagonally across the river and rammed
the bank on the other side. And the liner that will remain anonymous but
managed to send a tsunami up river removing the 9th and the 10th
hole of a local golf course from the face of the planet.
So obviously my ears
prick up when I see yet another program on why the RMS Titanic sank and
normally ‘I say oh not again’ and how many more theories can there be. But this
theory seemed to hold some water (which if you think about it, was exactly the
problem the boat had).
Journalist Senan
Molony has spent most of his life researching the sinking of the unsinkable. He
was given a selection of previously ‘unknown’
photographs of the boat taken by a chief engineer before it left Belfast. They
are a pictorial diary of her build and with the photographs being sequential,
they could be digitised and animated into 3d images to show the complete
structure of the ship in various stages. I was enchanted by this. The past came
to life. I was imagining the welders, the sparks, the joiners, the noise, the
smell.
But the photographs also show the mysterious shadow, a
mysterious shadow along her hull. At first it was thought to be some kind of
reflection of the water. But the mark is still there in other pictures where
the angle of daylight is different. The
mark was about 30 feet long, and on the right-hand side of the hull, near the
front. Near where the iceberg hit her.
Intriguing.
The first thing the new team questioned was the quality of
steel that appeared to be used in these pictures. It was adequate but not of
premium quality. The difference between adequate and premium is how the
molecular structure of steel behaves under extreme temperatures. At this point
I was wondering how cold it could possibly get, I mean the temperature of the ocean
does not change that much. It’s cold.
But I was missing the point.
The fearless researcher found that the shadow matched the
site of the second coal store, which was
three stories high. And was on fire. Shocking.
More shocking was the
fact the Titanic sailed, while she was on fire. The fire had already been burning for 10 days
by the time she set off for New York. The crew had been told not to say anything to
the passengers. It was a well known fact,
well enough known to be discussed at the enquiry afterwards but maybe not in too much detail as surely
somebody might have pointed out that while
the temperature of the sea doesn’t vary enough to alter the behaviour of steel, the temperature
of a fire burning up in a three story furnace just might do it.
So as the song says ‘the ship sailed on.’ With a fire
burning in her coal store. So I was a
bit shocked at that, having had drummed into me many a time that fire is a
huge danger at sea – it also made sense that the only way to put the fire in
the coal store out was to use the coal. So the boiler men simply shovelled the
coal from the bunker into the furnace as
fast as possible. As the ship sailed,
the fire would die as the bunker emptied of fuel. And the faster the boat went
the more coal she would use; the quicker the fire would burn out. But the
Olympic class of ship was bigger than any other previously built. Maybe the
12 firefighters on board couldn’t imagine
how difficult it would be, digging into the smouldering base of a fire with three stories of coal
above it.
And it was not an uncommon occurrence, these fires in coal
stores. Coal dust can spontaneously combust. The fire would be a red hot
smoulder rather than an inferno, but it could be easily over 1000 Cel at it’s
core. Enough to warp and weaken steel.
most of this happened
In early 1912, there
had been coal strike and fuel was in short supply so the boat sailed with
enough, but not much more than enough coal to get her to New York. So they took a gamble that, as they had to use
the fuel to get the fire out, they may as well go full speed ahead and
ensure they would get to New York. Even though they were told they were heading
into an iceberg field, the chances of there being an actual impact were remote. So they took the chance.
this did not happen
this did not happen either
She was, of course considered
unsinkable due to the bulk head and the compartment
system that meant any water ingress couldn’t go far enough to upset her balance,
so as she was ‘unsinkable’ there was no need for her to have enough lifeboats
for all the souls on board. She could creak onwards to her destination in New
York even with a huge hole in her hull.
Yet as we all know,
she sank very quickly.
At the time, a firemen
was interviewed and talked about the fires in the coal stores, plural. Had the fire caught
on in the next store? And the wall between was warped and weaked? An eyewitness
described them as red hot.
So when the iceberg penetrated the hull, the rush of water
entered and slapped right into a bulkhead
of weakened steel… and it gave way. The
unsinkable was suddenly very vulnerable.
It’s not a new theory seemingly but it’s the first time I’ve
heard it put together like that. It’s never one thing that causes huge
disasters like this, but a perfect storm of many little components. For the
want of a nail etc.
(The Exhibition in Belfast. I believe you are given the name of a passenger when you go in and on the way out you find out if you survived or not.)
And greed, commercialism
had a huge part to play. The White Star Line was keen to get the boat out
on time and had to be seen to be reliable, and Titanic had been delayed twice
already. The company was nearly broke. Ismay sent a telegram to recall all the
firefighters on board to return home ASAP. Evidence at the enquiry was maybe
not given the weight it should have had.
Something made that boat sink so quickly and it’s easy to be
smug and think it would never happen to day. Until the Herald of Free
Enterprise. The Concordia. The list is long. The Titanic might be the most
famous, but she wasn’t the last.
Caro Ramsay 06 01 2017
Wow, what a story! I never heard anything about the fires or the shadowy photos. Not sure if that comes from growing up in coal and steel country where no ill could be taught about either product, the fact I never saw the movie, or just plain ignorance. By the way, I'm not calling for a vote on which explanation is likeliest true.
ReplyDeleteI'd not heard about the fire either, until yesterday, when I read mention of it elsewhere. Great column, Caro.
ReplyDeleteAnd no, Jeff, please DON'T call for a vote. On anything. As a matter of fact, please don't even MENTION 'vote.'
The wounds are still oozing...
Ultimately, it was all about money. Don't worry EvKa, things will be different after the revolution.
ReplyDeleteI had heard stories about the substandard steel, which was brittle due to, from memory, a high sulphur content, but not about the fires, which explains quite a bit. Fascinating stuff, Caro, thanks!
ReplyDelete