Leye - Every other Wednesday
Photo by mattbuck |
Why do they call it office politics when it is clearly simply bad behaviour?
The terms, Office
Politics, Workplace Politics, or any variance with the word politics in it
seems to suggest that it is
something less evil, less conniving, less manipulative, and less destructive
than it is. Why the embellishment? Why not just call it what it really is: bad
behaviour. End of.
If someone's kid
habitually kicks your kid in the stomach, we don't call it playground politics,
do we? No. We name it for what it is: a demon possessed child whose parents
must now be summoned to a gathering of the school authorities and the other
kid's parents for a cleansing session of ritual shaming. We must do the same
with this wrongly named behaviour witnessed in our workplaces. We must call it
what it is: unacceptable bad behaviour that shall not be tolerated.
In my job as an agile
coach I often come across the worst in workplace behaviour. It's everything
from wearing the most ill-fitting, colour-clashing,
looked-better-on-the-mannequin outfits to work, to the huge Tupperware of
What-on-Earth-is-That reanimated to life in the office microwave oven. The
times I've approached the microwave only to beat a hasty retreat as wafts of
the latest aberration to be sacrificed in the oven threaten to purge my lungs
of everything good and cling to my clothes forever.
But where some forms
of bad behaviour require nothing more severe than a strategically timed
turned-up nose and eye-roll, some particular behaviours deserve an instant
red-card. All behaviours perviously classed as office politics deserve this
one-strike-and-you-are-out approach, as far as I'm concerned.
This then calls for a
classification system. How do we group various behaviours witnessed at work
into the benign, the slightly annoying but not so bad, the irritating but 'I
don't need to punch you yet', and the 'Your voodoo doll is getting it tonight'?
I say let's start by
renaming the class of behaviours formerly referred to as office politics. Let's
start by listing the behaviours and naming them for what they really are:
1.
Harmful gossip about
colleagues
2.
Conniving to destroy
collegues
3.
Plotting against colleagues
4.
Spreading lies about
colleagues
5.
Withholding
information from colleagues so that they may fail
6.
Withholding
information that might exonerate or lead to praise for a colleague
7.
Knowingly giving false
information to colleagues
8.
Taking credit for
achievements and work done by colleagues
9.
Wrongly apportioning
blame to colleagues
10. Forming alliances to destroy collegues
11. Practicing a strategy of tearing colleagues down to cover one's
incompetences and / or mistakes
12. Spying on colleagues
13. Bossing colleagues just to feel important
14. Bossing colleagues to make them cry
15. Bossing colleagues, being unfair, unkind, and harsh on them
because you don't like them
16. Getting colleagues fired
The list goes on and
on, hence the need for an all-encompassing term such as office politics - which
is the wrong term. For the sake of brevity, let us simply refer to the afore
mentioned as 'bad behaviours.' Let us further agree that no form of bad
behaviour shall be tolerated. Let us go even one step further and state boldly,
'Call me out if I'm being bad.'
Now, that is a work
environment in which I would love to work. A place where it is unacceptable to
be bad in any way to the people you work with. A place where we shall only do
onto others as we wish them do onto us.
An important part of
my job is the wellbeing of the members of my teams. My measure of how well or
not I'm doing at any point is whether I have reason to suspect that just one
member of a team is waking up and wishing they didn't have to come to work
because someone is making the workplace unbearable for them. I know how that
feels and I cannot stomach the thought of anyone going through it: waking up at
four am, unable to go back to sleep as your mind tosses and turns over the
issue at work. The issue invariably is a person and what it is
about the person is usually their behaviour; their scheming, their conniving,
their plotting, their manipulating, their bullying, their violence in
communication, their work place violence.
Hey! We just found the
correct term: Work Place Violence!
Let us stop giving
tacit approval to bad behaviour by employing euphemisms like Workplace
Politics. Let us boldly identify all bad behaviour, name them and point them
out when we witness them. Let us spread the word that Work Place Violence will
not be tolerated.
I'm lucky; in my role
I get to contribute to the creation of environments in which Work Place
Violence is starved of the oxygen it needs to thrive, that oxygen being a
potent mix of rigid hierarchy, lack of transparency, a thriving blame culture,
the setting of impossible targets and inhuman expectations and much more.
I have witnessed so
much of the damage done to people by Work Place Violence that I am now
instantly nauseated when anyone refers to it as Office Politics. It is not
politics; it is violence. And it is not acceptable.
Leye, after reading your post, I realize I've been blessed for most of my professional life, because I can honestly say that in all the decades at my law firm--not counting a decade at a Wall Street firm--I experienced none of what you so appropriately describe as "workplace violence." I say "virtually" only because gossip of course existed, but without any intent to harm. As for why none of that happened, I think because we simply weren't a crew that would tolerate that sort of behavior among our colleagues. Or that everyone knew I was licensed to carry a handgun.
ReplyDelete:-) @ "...Or that everyone knew I was licensed to carry a handgun."
ReplyDeleteNo workplace violence of any type is a good and worthy goal. People must work for a living and the conditions should be humane.
ReplyDelete