Tony Broadbent is the author of the Smoke Series, three excellent crime novels set in London in the period immediately following the Second World War.
Two weeks ago, he penned a post entitled London Peculiar. You can find it in our archives by entering those two words into the search box at the foot of this page.
Now, Tony's back with a second installment, another one you're sure to enjoy:
London Particular – Regarding
Murder Most Foul
‘The de Antiquis Affair’
Murder
and murderers have a very particular notoriety in the annals of crime, and perhaps
nevermore so than when they occur in a country’s capital city—inevitably the
center of government, banking, policing, the arts, and the media. As for
London—statistics from the last hundred and fifty years or so show that more
than half of all murders in Britain have taken place in and around the
ever-expanding city—and as sobering a thought as that might be, it is—on
reflection—hardly surprising.
In
London—and again in the larger scheme of things perhaps not entirely unexpected—patterns
of crime tend to follow patterns of housing—in terms of location, class of
housing, and population density. For instance, in the days when London required
a large servant population—think the town and country of Upstairs, Downstairs and Downton
Abbey—most murders occurred where the servant population was most
concentrated. In middle-class areas—especially the more genteel suburbs to the west—it
was bigamy and fraud that most often led to murder. Whereas, in the working
class East End—and more immediate areas south of the river—such as the Elephant
and Castle—it was street fights and gang activities that invariably proved the
most lethal.
Yet
of all the many murders committed in all the many boroughs of London, some
murders still stand out from the rest. One such murder—now mostly forgotten even
by Londoners—occurred back in April 29th, 1947—where ‘East’ meets ‘West’—just north of Soho—in London’s ‘Fitzrovia.’
The
murder shocked capital and country as if to the very core and became known as
‘The de Antiquis Affair.’ And for many people, its callous, almost careless brutality—its very
randomness—came to symbolize
the crime wave that then appeared to be threatening to overwhelm all of post-war
London.
It all began one afternoon, just gone two o’clock—‘Double
Summer Time’—when three masked men—attempted to rob Jay’s The Jewellers, at 73-75 Charlotte Street, just off the Tottenham
Court Road.
The gang entered the shop brandishing revolvers—two of
them with pistols in each hand. One of the raiders jumped over the counter and
grabbed for a tray of diamond rings. Ernest Stock, a 62-year old director of
the firm, lunged forward to stop him and was knocked down and was savagely pistol-whipped
for his efforts. All of which gave Bertram Keates, the firm’s 70-year old manager,
time to slam the safe door shut.
The
gang then turned on Keates and demanded he hand over the keys to the safe. At
which point a 17-year old shop assistant, Leslie Grant, threw a wooden stool at
them. One of the gang turned and shot at him, but the bullet hit a
glass-paneled door and buried itself into a wall—another brief diversion that then
allowed Keates to press a button that set off the store’s burglar alarm.
The sudden noise and clamor unnerved the would-be
robbers and they turned and fled outside to their waiting car—a Vauxhall saloon
they’d stolen prior to the robbery. They all bundled in and it was only then
that the driver realized the motorcar was hemmed in, at the kerb, by two parked
lorries and a newly arrived delivery van.
Alarm
bell ringing. People gesticulating wildly and shouting: “Stop thief!” “Police!
Police!” The gang abandoned the getaway car and began to run off down the
street. And it was at that precise moment that Alec de Antiquis—a 31-year old father of 6
children—was passing by on his big, red, Indian
motorbike.
De
Antiquis took in the situation in an
instant—saw
three masked gunmen trying to make good their escape—and he attempted to block their
progress by switching
off the motorbike's engine and steering it directly at them. When both he and his bike
eventually slid to a stop, one of the robbers shot him in the head and the gang then quickly
vanished into busy, nearby
streets.
As
Alec de Antiquis lay dying, in the gutter, attended by stunned onlookers, a
press agency photographer, Geoffrey Harrison, took the photograph—a single,
striking, black and white image—that was forever after associated with the
crime and which was to focus the world's attention on London gangland and the
intense murder investigation that then ensued.
Enter
stage right—Detective Superintendent Robert Fabian of Scotland Yard. Fabian was
already well known to the public for having successfully foiled a terrorist
bomb-plot at Piccadilly Circus, just before the war. His role—to head up the
enquiry that in time would become one of the London's most intense
murder-hunts. A large scale operation that would see brilliant detective work,
and bring into play the very latest in forensic and ballistic methodologies and
technologies, and eventually see the flooding of London’s streets by policemen—in
a conscious attempt to so severely interrupt the everyday execution of crime,
that it’d cause London’s underworld to want to search for and give up the
murder suspects themselves—just to re-establish the natural order between thief
and thief-taker.
Twenty-seven
witnesses made statements—most of which turned out to be at odds with each other—but
one, a taxi-driver, reported having seen two masked men disappear into Brook
House, Tottenham Court Road, soon after the time of the murder. And when the
police searched the premises they found a discarded raincoat and a scarf folded
into a triangle, as might be used for a mask.
The
raincoat was eventually traced to 23-year old Charles Henry Jenkins—who had a
criminal record—and he was duly brought in for questioning. (It’s important to note
here that postwar Britain was living under stringent Government mandated
rationing measures—and was still doing its level best to survive the peace. All
clothing was subject to strict annual, coupon-based allowances and so most
overcoats sold had a supplier’s label sewn inside and, as like as not, a serial
number, too, hidden away somewhere.)
Against all the odds, the two guns that’d been fired
in the incident were then discovered down by the river by two schoolboys—the
first a .455 calibre ‘English Bulldog’ revolver found by a ten-year-old, near
Shadwell Docks—the other, a .320 revolver, by a seven-year-old, on the muddy
foreshore, a mile away, at Wapping. Both boys had attempted to fire the guns, themselves,
but neither had been unable to pull back the triggers. Ballistic tests—by
firearms expert Robert Churchill—later conclusively proved that the first gun found
was the one fired in Jay’s the Jeweller’s—the second gun to be the one that fired
the bullet that had killed Alec de Antiquis.
There was a bit of a step-back when all 27 witnesses
to the shooting then failed to pick out Jenkins in a police identity parade.
However, by that time, the police had also arrested two of Jenkins' known associates:
Christopher James Geraghty (aged 21) and Terence Peter Rolt (aged 17). Under
questioning, Geraghty
was first to talk, then Rolt, and it was his confession that directly implicated
Jenkins for
the murder of de Antiquis.
All
three men were then charged with the murder of Alec de Antiquis. And after a
week-long trial—at the Old Bailey—when it took the jury but 15 minutes to return a verdict of guilty—all three were found guilty.
Rolt, being under 18-years of age, at the time of the crime, was sentenced to be
detained at His Majesty's Pleasure. Jenkins and Geraghty were sentenced to
death and were duly hanged—side-by-side—in a double execution—on 19 September 1947—by famed hangman, Albert
Pierrepoint—who’d dispatched all the Nazi war criminals after the Nuremburg War
Trials—at London’s Pentonville Prison.
Much
of the press reaction at the time focused on the breakdown of law and order,
the increasing rise in youth crime, the spread of illegal firearms, and the
deterrent value of capital punishment. Not unnaturally, it also led to
questions being asked in Parliament—a sure sign that events had touched a
national nerve.
However,
the de Antiquis Affair also brought together a number of unique personalities—all
of whom were famous in their own right. Among them, the pioneering forensic
pathologist, Sir Bernard Spilsbury; the crusading Fleet Street journalist,
Duncan Webb; hangman, Albert Pierrepoint; and, of course, Scotland Yard’s very
own Detective Superintendent Robert Fabian. Fabian’s matchless detective
work—and leadership—led to the creation of the hit television series 'Fabian of the Yard’, which later
inspired the classic film, 'The Blue Lamp'—a
huge box office success starring Dirk Bogarde and Jack Warner. And that film—in
turn—then gave rise to one of England’s longest running police procedural
television series: Dixon of Dock Green.
The
de Antiquis Affair touched British popular culture as few murders and murderers
have done—save perhaps for London’s grim catalogue of serial killers such as
Jack the Ripper, John Reginald Christie, and John George Hague—but in many
regards—it remains unique in the annals of London crime.
There
is, of course, much, much more to The de Antiquis Affair and all the many individuals
who played a part in it—and for any Murder
Everywhere reader interested in delving deeper into the crime, I can’t recommend
Paul Willetts’s wonderful book North Soho
999 highly enough—it’s a brilliant tour
de force—much of it cold, hard fact—but it reads like an out-and-out, unabashed
thriller.
You just keep coming up with one after another terrific story, Tony. Thanks for this one...and the many others I hope to read soon.
ReplyDeletethanks
ReplyDeleteHow do you all do it? Keep your blog interesting with perfect illustrations or photos and crisp writing? Ah. . .writers!
ReplyDeleteSpilsbury was a great pathologist but as I'm sure you know questions have been raised over his theatrics, his obsession in working alone, his dogmatic, sometimes hubristic manner and total self belief. He is used as the example to students that the evidence is tested, not the pathologist. The expert witness is never bigger than the evidence he presents. Did his dogmatism lead to a miscarriage of justice in the Crippen case? We will never know.....
ReplyDeleteMy name is Sharon and I am the granddaughter of Alec De Antiquis. My mother Rosalind was one of his children. I was not even born when my grandfather was murdered as my mother was only 8 years old. I have seen photographs of him and have been told by my mother what a loving and courageous husband and father he was. I will always be indebted to the people who helped bring his killers to justice. I would love to have known him and feel sad that my mother and her siblings had to grow up without their father. I am very interested in finding out any information about the case and have my own copy of "North Solo 999"
ReplyDeleteHi Sharon, my name is Karl and Christopher Geraghty was my grandmother's brother. I would like to extend my sincerest sympathies to you and your family.
DeleteChristopher was executed 42 years before I was born and my grandmother passed away before I found out about the robbery and murder. My knowledge is very brief and limited to what I learnt while researching my own ancestry, so unfortunately I don't have any extra information that would be of any use to you.
I would however love to hear anything you can tell me about your grandfather. Descriptions of him seem to be limited to "Alec De Antiquis, father of six", which doesn't do his heroism in this event justice.
My dad was evacuated during WW2 to the home of Geoffrey Russell Vick, Geraghty's defence lawyer. My dad used to write to him after the war and Lord Vick told my dad how deeply effected he was by his inability to save his client from the hangman. He worked tirelessly after this case to get the death penalty off the books.
ReplyDelete