Showing posts with label Kronborg castle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kronborg castle. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 11, 2024

THERE’S A SERIAL KILLER UPSTAIRS . . . and other dark meanderings of a mystery writer’s mind

Wed--Kwei

For some 19 years, I lived in a single-family home in Pasadena, CA. Having sold it this year, I’m temporarily renting an apartment as I ponder what to buy and where to live next. There are some advantages to living in a rental property. For example, you don’t pay anyone for maintenance or no-fault repairs, and the plumbing or electrical guy could be at your service in less than an hour.

The view from my balcony


However, for a person like me who relishes complete silence, apartments are noisy: baby crying, dog barking, wheeler luggage going down the corridor, the maintenance cart clattering along the hallway. In a single-family home, there are some disturbances from the neighborhood—e.g., the sanitation trucks on Thursday mornings and the infernal leaf blowers. Still, these are, by and large, predictable and limited, whereas apartment noise is random.


Things that go bump in the night

For several weeks, I’ve noticed heavy footfall from the tenant in the apartment directly above me. The floor plan is the same as my dwelling, so I can pinpoint where they’re walking: from the bedroom to the bathroom and then back to bed, or from the bedroom to the sitting room or kitchen multiple times, back and forth.

Added to this are the sounds of furniture scraping and being moved about and drawers or cabinets repeatedly opening and shutting. Occasionally, there’s a clatter of some kind of hard object on the floor. On Saturday morning last weekend, I was startled to hear explosions from the apartment. It took me a few seconds to realize that the upstairs tenant was playing a video game with a powerful subwoofer speaker at max volume. 

For most normal people, this would merely be a nuisance of living in an apartment setting. But to me, the murder-mystery writer, it’s far more ominous. The tenant—for argument’s sake, let’s assume it’s a male—is, in fact, a serial killer moving dead bodies around, hence all those banging sounds. The loud music on Saturday mornings is to drown out the victims’ screams. The offender likely has a large deep freeze in which he hides the chopped-up body parts. Remember how Dahmer’s neighbor kept telling the police something was up? Well, don’t say I didn’t alert y'all when you hear about it on the 6 o’clock news.


My Bimodal Imagination

Like other murder-mystery writers (you know yourselves), I spend a lot of time figuring out story plots for whatever the current novel is. To do that, we must look at a crime from the murderer’s perspective. How would a killer access the victim? How would the killer escape and cover their tracks? What are the motives and opportunities? 

Then, we must put ourselves in the shoes of the victim. What was their life like? Where were they when murdered? With whom did they make enemies or argue? What were their secrets? 

Life imitates art—and vice versa.

The reason I imagine there’s a serial killer above me is that my line between fiction and reality is--how should I put it?--somewhat indistinct. 

While seated in a restaurant, I prefer to face a window onto the street in case someone sketchy is approaching with malicious intent, and I often look for an alternative exit route in case something kicks off. 

Every rusty camper vehicle I see has a dead body in the back, without a doubt. 

All manner of evil lies therein (Image: Shutterstock)


I love the woods; a corpse or skeleton from a cold case is just around the next tree. 

Murder is indeed everywhere (Image: Leonardo AI)


All rivers have at least one dumped body that will become a floater before long. 

All hotels have a fair number of guests engaged in extramarital sex while away from home. 

Dark, crumbling old buildings are suspicious, as are dark storerooms. Once, when I visited Denmark’s Kronborg Castle, featured in Hamlet, I somehow found my way into a dimly-lit, Authorized Personnel Only area that was off-piste from the typical tourist’s path. And then I discovered the door I’d come in had locked behind me. Oh, crap. I began to sweat. I’m in big trouble. Fortunately, I located another door that allowed me to exit. Phew! One of the guards spotted me and asked what I was doing there. “Um, I got lost,” I muttered and bolted.

Kronborg Castle, Denmark: No way is it not hiding a beheaded skeleton
(Image: Pinterest)

At the airport, I don’t rule out that the little blue-haired granny ahead of me could be wired with explosives. Which way should I run when she opens her jacket? Even when I'm not spotting criminals, the airport is a good place to make up stories about passengers scurrying back and forth—where do they come from? Do they gamble? Is that perfectly benign-looking guy with a lovely wife and kids talking to his secret lover on the phone?

"Look, I told you, don't call me. I'll call you. Bye."
(Image: Leonardo AI)


My diagnosis

As a physician, I categorize and name everything. So, I asked Chat GPT to give a professional opinion about my state of mind as a mystery writer. This is what it said about me:

A clinical term for this phenomenon could be “fantasy ideation” or “narrative immersion.” However, if it becomes excessive or causes distress, it could overlap with a recognized psychological concept called maladaptive daydreaming.

In the context of a mystery writer, this could simply be considered a heightened form of creative visualization or immersive imagination, which are common traits in creative professionals. It’s only when these thoughts interfere significantly with daily functioning that they might be considered part of a psychological condition.

If you’d like a more literary spin on the term, you could consider “fictional transposition syndrome,” reflecting the blending of fiction and reality in a writer’s mind.

So, now you know the workings of my dark mind. Bouchercon might never have me back.








Thursday, June 13, 2013

Hamlet had tennis elbow

Shakespeare at Elsinore

I have always been puzzled by Shakespeare’s Hamlet.  If you remember, Claudius was Hamlet’s uncle.  Claudius killed his own brother, Hamlet’s father, and then married Hamlet's mother, Gertrude.  Obviously he did this so he could succeed to the throne, which he did. 

Needless to say, Hamlet was upset.

But what did he do about it? 

Nothing!  He wandered around muttering to himself, even though the ghost of his father told him what had happened.  Any self-respecting prince would have run Claudius through.  But no, Hamlet did nothing.

Why?  That’s the puzzle.

Of course, if Hamlet had just reacted like any hot blooded young man would, the play would have been over before the end of Act 1, which would have ruined Shakespeare’s reputation.  So academics have spent hundreds of years trying to explain Hamlet’s weird behaviour.

Several theories have been advanced over the years trying to explain Hamlet’s reluctance to do Claudius in.  Freud, in his The Interpretation of Dreams, concludes that Hamlet had an Oedipal Complex, and had an Oedipal desire for his mother.  If he killed Claudius, he would then be hurting his mother.  So he held off – and in doing so drove himself mad.

Other interpretations of Hamlet’s behaviour have suggested that he was sexually attracted to his mother.  In the closet scene, where he confronts Gertrude in her private quarters, he is disgusted by her incestuous relationship with Claudius, but is concerned that if he kills Claudius, he would be tempted to sleep with her himself.    

A different type of explanation for Hamlet’s reluctance to kill Claudius suggests that Hamlet is just an ineffectual intellectual.  There is much to support this notion:

“There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.” (Act 2, scene ii)

“To be or not to be: that is the question.” (Act 3, scene i)

Freud also hints that Hamlet couldn’t make a strong decision because Hamlet thinks “he himself is literally no better than the sinner whom he is to punish.”

And Hamlet himself, when he has the opportunity to kill Claudius when he is praying, hesitates because he thinks that someone killed while praying will go to heaven. 

“A villain kills my father; and for that,
I, his sole son, do this same villain send
To heaven.” (Act 3, scene iii)

Of course he still does nothing.

As a recovering academic, I see that all these explanations are meant to dazzle fellow academics, thus hopefully leading to tenure.  But none of them is correct.

I discovered the real truth yesterday when I visited Kronborg Castle in Helsingør (Elsinore) - where all of the action of Hamlet takes placeto commune with the plethora of ghosts who still hang out there.  

Kronborg Castle (Elsinore)

Kronborg Castle (Elsinore) - Sweden in background

Self-portrait at the top of the castle

“Why didn’t Hamlet kill Claudius right away?” I asked the wispy group.  

It was poor Ophelia (in love with Hamlet, but told to reject him by her father Polonius and brother, Laertes) who gave me the reason.

“Don’t believe any of the academic claptrap,” she said.  “It’s simple.  He had tennis elbow and couldn’t use his sword!”

I gasped at this academic sacrilege.

“We used to play a lot of royal tennis in our outdoor court between the moats,” she continued.  “Hamlet was a fiend and liked to win.  Eventually he had to stop because he got a mild case of sunstroke (“I am too much I’ the sun.” Act 1, scene ii), as well as a painful case of tennis elbow.”

Outdoor real (royal) tennis court building

The real (royal) tennis court itself

What caused Hamlet's pain!

“That’s really painful,” I said.  “I had it once, and it lasted for months.”

“Yes.  He became very impatient with the usual heat treatment because the pain didn’t go away.  He would curse and swear at his arm (“O, that this too too solid flesh would melt, Thaw and resolve itself into a dew.” Act 1, scene ii), but his mother kept telling him to be patient (“Upon the heat and flame of thy distemper Sprinkle cool patience.” Act 3, scene iv).

“He kept testing to see if the arm had healed.  He used to take hold of me and tried to straighten his arm (“”He took me by the wrist and held me hard; Then he goes to the length of all his arm.” Act 2, scene i).  It was pitiful (“And, with his other hand thus o’er his brow, .. . . He raised a sigh so piteous and profound As it did seem to shatter all his bulk.” Act 2, scene i).

“In the end, his mother decided to send him south to the warmer climate of England, where he could convalesce.”

“Then what happened?” I asked.

“It must have worked, because he came back – I wasn’t around then because I'd drowned – and had a fencing match with my brother Laertes.  Poor Gertrude toasted the two of them, but didn’t realize the chalice of wine had been poisoned by Claudius.  So she died.  Laertes didn’t play fair, and tipped his sword with poison.  He scratched Hamlet, who realized what was going on.  He managed to grab Laertes sword and scratch him back.  Then he realized that Claudius was still alive, so he stabbed him and made him drink the poisoned wine just to make sure he died.

"What a mess.  Bodies all over the place!  It would have been much better had Hamlet killed Claudius right away.  Then we would have got married and had kids and lived happily ever after.”

So there you have it – from someone who should know.

Hamlet delayed in killing Claudius, not because of those airy-fairy academic reasons we read about, but because he had tennis elbow.


Stan - Thursday