Showing posts with label Fox News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fox News. Show all posts

Saturday, April 22, 2023

Dominion Voting Systems One, FOX NEWS Zip


Jeff–Saturday

 

Much of the media coverage this past week on a settlement reached on the first day of trial in the Dominion Voting Systems v. Fox News defamation lawsuit, got under my skin. So much so, that I decided to blog about it. But in a parody roughly based upon Mark Antony‘s soliloquy at Caesar’s funeral in Act III, Scene II of Shakespeare’s (who else) “Julius Caesar.”

 

The gist of what prompted my displeasure was watching the talking heads at some of the more liberal news networks tearing into Dominion and its lawyers for daring to settle this lawsuit.  They would have preferred to see Dominion risk it all for the potential psychic joy many might find in weeks, if not months, of reporting on FOX stars and key executives badgered and roasted in court while fessing up to truths about lies they’d been telling for years.

 


Yes, that would have made terrific theater, but done nothing toward guaranteeing compensation for the victim.

 

It’s also unclear the extent to which any of that would affect FOX’s ratings dominance.  After all, FOX is said to simply ignore reporting on anything it doesn’t wish its base to know—such as, for example, the amount or even the fact of its settlement with Dominion!

 

Bottom line, I see this as an expression of Fox’s critics’ anger at missing out on watching their longtime ratings nemesis relentlessly chastened as it twists in the wind on someone else’s nickel.

 


But we’re not talking about nickels. To be precise, Dominion would be passing on FOX’s 787.5 million dollar offer of settlement, a/k/a more than three-quarters of a billion dollars, a/k/a $787,500,000.00

 

WOW, those numbers remind me of some of the digits appearing in my new contract with my new publisher—more on that later.

 

So, here’s what I see as Mark Antony’s likely take on the masterful job done by Dominion and its lawyers:

 


FOX, CNN, MSNBC, lend me your ears.
I’ve come to bury Dominion, not to praise it.
The evil that networks do lives on;
The good is oft interrèd with their brands.
So it may be with Dominion. Murdoch
Hath told you Dominion was litigious,
And to strike at FOX was a grievous fault.
But Dominion pursued on undeterred,
Doing battle with Murdoch and his son.
(Murdoch is said an honorable man;
The same as others claim to be at FOX),
So they do not need me to speak for them.
Our besieged champion Dominion does,
‘Cause Murdoch views life as sacrilegious
When not seen as an honorable man.
For he brought many viewers home to FOX,
Along with ratings that filled its coffers,
Launching bitter lies at Dominion’s heart.
While FOX’s competitors whined and bantered,

Dominion showed itself of sterner stuff.
Facing down Murdoch’s minions’s words and threats,
And claims to be an honorable man,
The court did see, behind Carlson et al,
Was Murdoch offering a kingly crown
To one who claimed in lies to have earned it.
Still, Murdoch stood in battle, toe-to-toe,
Until his sharp rebuke before the court.
But I speak not to explore Murdoch’s words,
Rather to reveal what I do now know:
All that we’ve learned we owe to Dominion,
Yet the media is faint in its praise.
Favoring schadenfreude over clear judgment?
Has envy driven their reason away?
Dominion did its job: FOX surrendered.

To beat FOX ratings is another’s job––

Requiring far sterner stuff than banter.

 

Bravo, Dominion and its legal team, on a job well done.

 

Now for the promised announcement.

 


I’m thrilled beyond measure to announce that Chief Inspector Andreas Kaldis has found a new home at Severn House/Canongate Books and his next adventure (Book #13) will be released in February 2024.  It is set on Greece’s grand dame Aegean island of Syros–with New York City’s East Village in a supporting role–and features an
ambitious cast of complex characters caught up in the most challenging societal issue of our time: the dark-side ramifications of Artificial Intelligence.

 

–Jeff

 

 

Thursday, December 30, 2021

Gobbledygook

Stanley – Thursday

I dedicate this blog to my friend Peter Rozovsky, who is appropriately scathing about the decline of good language, particularly in newspapers.


Peter Rozovsky

Over coffee yesterday morning, I said to Michael that I wanted to write a blog on badly written headlines. [I really dislike having to reread a headline, often many times, before I understand what it is trying to say.]


What sparked my comment was a headline that I had just read from the December 29 edition of the Texas News Today (texasnewstoday.com). 

Both Michael and I decided that what it meant was that the parents of a teenager were charged after he shot and killed his 5-year-old sibling. Of course, one shouldn’t need a discussion to decipher a headline, and we snickered a bit at the poor quality of writing. 

For chuckles, I then read the first paragraph of the report. Little did I know where this was going to take me.

Pennsylvania’s 13-year-old parents, who were accused of shooting and killing their 5-year-old brother in November, are now being charged with themselves.

I nearly choked. I never knew that teenage siblings were allowed to marry in Pennsylvania. I guess that the USA is so large that there is always something new and interesting.


And what did it mean to be 'charged with themselves'?


Michael and I then decided that this news report had to be a parody.


However, it wasn’t. The Texas News Today is a real online publication, and this is what it promises its readers:

Texasnewstoday.com, the pioneer of news sources & operates under the philosophy of keeping its readers informed of what’s happening out there. It strives to be very accurate by leaving no stone unturned as it digs into the heart of every story on the local as well as international level.

Armed with this promise of good journalism, I couldn't wait to read more of the article. Here are some excerpts:

Sarah Garwig and Thomas Wolfe, respectively, endanger the welfare of their children after Connor Wolfe’s death in Penn Hills on November 22, according to a criminal accusation filed by the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office on Fox News Digital on Tuesday. He has been charged with exposing him.

This was also an eye-opener, not only for the confusing writing, but also because I learned for the first time that criminal accusations in Pennsylvania are now filed on Fox News Digital.

WTAE reported that the suspect, who was also accused of possessing firearms by a minor, shot Connor Wolf after being angry with his brother who jumped into a bed in the house. is doing.

By this time, I was getting the distinct impression that texasnewstoday.com didn't employ a copy editor.

While interviewing Thomas Wolfe and Sarah Garwig separately, Thomas admitted that he had left his pistol safely on top of his gun in their ground floor master bedroom. “Thomas uses his pistol as his daily carrying gun when he leaves the house.” 

A nice touch - the suspect being able to interview himself! I think I may move to Pennsylvania.

The station added that the teenager said he went into his father’s bedroom to get his father’s firearms to scare his brother. But when the 13-year-old boy pointed his gun at Wolf and triggered it, he said he believed that safety was turned on, according to WTAE.  

Wolf was beaten in the head and later died in a local hospital.

Hmm. I thought that Connor Wolf (or Wolfe) had been shot.


You can read the whole article here. It isn't long.


How could such a mess reach publication stage? I wondered. As I was thinking about that, I noticed a coloured SOURCE LINK. Aha, I exclaimed. The story came from somewhere else. I clicked on the link and was surprised when a Fox News article appeared. The headline was a little different and understandable.



A little different from the Texas version.


I read the article, which was clearly written and didn't confuse the reader. You can read it here.


So, how did a decent article end up so badly? 


Perhaps texasnewstoday.com didn't have the money to use the Fox News article and commissioned one of its own writers to produce a new article based on the Fox News one.


Or perhaps the writer at texasnewstoday.com wanted his name on a piece rather than just using the Fox News article. So he took the original article and rewrote it (tried to rewrite it) and perhaps ran out of time to proofread it. 


Whatever the reason, the result is awful.


Any experienced writer knows the moral of this story, namely ALWAYS have someone else, preferably someone who is literate, read what you have written before it goes public. It could spare you a lot of embarrassment.


So now I am compiling a list of bad or awkward or incomprehensible headlines. I will share it next year. Please let me have any you come across. 


I wish all Murder is Everywhere readers and bloggers a very healthy, happy, and prosperous 2022. I hope we look back on it with more affection than the current year.


Clink,


Stan