What the newspapers made of it all.
There was a survey carried out recently that showed
the twenty richest and the twenty poorest areas in Europe. London was one of the richest. Germany seemed
to have a lot. The north of England had five ‘poor’ zones, Wales and Northern
Ireland one each.
Scotland had neither.
Unemployment
in GB is at its lowest level for 28 years. OK so much of that will be
zero hours contract and minimal wage jobs but it is a sign that the economy is
starting to breathe again. The house market
in London has gone frankly bonkers, prices spiralling out of control.
Like they didn’t learn that lesson last time.
So bearing all that in mind, I read the highlights of
the report from the Smith Commission
this week. I didn’t understand much of it.
I don’t think anybody is supposed to.
Many of the ‘yes’ voters believe that the only reason folk voted no was
the last minute offer of greater devolution of power to the Scottish
Parliament. This offer was made by all three UK parties to the people of
Scotland. And Lord Smith was given the job of
bringing a document to the table – within eight weeks.
Would you let this man a) walk your dog
b) sell you a used car
c) run the country
Second thing to bear in mind is that we have a
nationalist majority in the Scottish Government. A conservative government in
Westminster and Scotland only has one
Conservative MP. That might be due to the dreadful mess of the labour party and
its apparently unelectable leader Ed Milliband.
Jim Murphy who looks a bit like......
a man who gets things done....
But there is a young
Scot rising fast through the ranks. He looks like Voldemort so he might
be able to pull the country together again.
So who is Lord Smith of the Smith report exactly?
He is a rather charismatic, smiley individual. He
was in charge of the organising committee for the Glasgow commonwealth
games. With his other hat on, he is a
professional chairman currently of the UK Green Investment Bank. He is also
Chancellor of the University of Strathclyde and a Director of Standard Bank
Group. He is Chairman of Children in Need, Chairman of the National Museums of
Scotland, Chair of Glasgow’s Riverside Museum Appeal, and Vice-Chair of the
Kelvingrove Appeal. He was born and educated in Glasgow, knighted in 1999, went to the House of Lords in
2008, and was appointed Knight of the Thistle in 2013. That does not hurt.
He still talks like a Glaswegian.
So he was the natural man to turn to when the
government (Westminster ) were searching for somebody to steer Scotland towards the newer
more independent state while keeping the union intact.
All the major parties contributed to the report.
Three nationalists councillors burned it on sight. So you can imagine what the
white paper looks like when all parties got their say; far right, far left,
green, nationalist, unionist,, down right bonkers.
This chappie might be better at running the country....
Who said that the duck billed platypus was designed
by a committee?
So here’s the highlights. Just enough to give you the gist.
The conservatives
want all tax revenues including income tax, national insurance, corporation
tax, capital gains tax, fuel duty, air passenger duty and inheritance to remain
payable to Westminster. Unless there is a reason not to (unspecified). Holyrood would be
responsible for all public spending and would pay Westminster for certain services,
(unspecified). Holyrood will also have power to borrow money.
Meanwhile labour want Holyrood to be able to raise
40% of its budget by increasing the tax-varying powers. Not necessarily the tax
rate… but it sounds rather like it. They reckon it will bring in another £2
billion. (defo sounds like a rise in tax
rate to me!). And reading further down Holyrood will have the power to raise
higher rates of tax. Again all other taxes will remain under the power of
Westminster, including corporation tax.
The Barnett formula will continue. That is the formula
that tries to distribute public spending around the four nations of the UK.
Which mean every person on Scotland is sponsored by Westminster to the tune of
£1700 per year.
Liberal Democrats? Holyrood should have enough
fiscal power to raise most of what it spends. Barnett should be retained. But Westminster will retain the power to
spend in defence and social protection (?) and equity (?).
Does social protection mean the police (Scottish
anyway) or the Health Service (Scottish anyway) or Social Work?
The greens think Scotland should be in control of all
powers of tax. And should be able to borrow what they like from who they like.
Without limits set by Westminster.
All this will be interesting as the SNP‘s membership
has increased by 100’s of percent since
the referendum. From the extreme left to the extreme right – their only uniting
factor is independence. And the majority of the country voted against that.
With regard to our welfare state, the Conservatives think
Scotland should have powers over all welfare spending (including retiral and pensionable
ages). Labour think that housing benefit
and attendance allowance should be devolved but all the rest should remain
under Westminster control. The Liberal Democrats said that there should be one
system for all in the UK. (At the moment in Scotland we have free care for the
elderly if they can’t pay, free prescriptions and drugs. The rest of the UK
does not). The Greens want most of the Scottish welfare system to come under
the control of Scotland whereas the Scottish Conservatives said something about
Scotland should contribute towards the UK welfare benefits bill. ( I think they
might have sussed that we get a very big slice of that cake!)
So will we represent ourselves in the EU?
What about defence and foreign affairs? Here’s a quote
about the Greens contribution to the White report. ‘Scotland should be
represented in UK overseas delegations and "Scotland's perspective"
to be taken into account in UK international negotiations’
And what about Wales? Northern Ireland? Are they not getting a say?
The range of options on finance, currency,
regulation, debt management and employment law are frightening. And confusing.
As is the statement ‘human rights law should be
devolved’
And "a degree of flexibility" in
immigration and asylum rules. Is that the far right getting their nasty little
oar in?
These are to be considered a starting point only but
I’d love to be a fly on the wall.
Reactions from the leaders of the parties are :
'It's a good deal' / Powers are 'disappointing/ 'best of both worlds.
From my chit chat around town, the thought of the
tax rate being in the hands of Holyrood is making a few think again about any
further devolution.
Just as a footnote before you fall asleep, I was at
my accountant yesterday for my yearly …whatever it’s called. His opinion ? Common sense has gone out the
window. Nothing upsets an economy like uncertainty.
Two faced but legitimately so.
I hope it’s a Zaphod Beeblebrox situation. You know
where power struggles amongst
politicians and other useless twerps grabs all the media so that the somebody sensible somewhere can get with the important stuff
without the twerps interfering.
Oh and Alex Salmond, after resigning from leader of
the SNP and from his job as First Minister of Scotland has now decided to stand
for the Westminster parliament. In a
seat that voted overwhelmingly ‘no’. As the present incumbent said ‘we took pleasure
in rejecting him at the referendum and we’ll take just as much pleasure in rejecting
him again.
But it means Alec is still on the TV, spouting
forth.
I am going to put my head in a bucket, call me when
it’s over.
Caro Ramsay 12 12 2014
That sounds complicated and somewhat goofy as happens when politicians are involved. We have a much simpler system in the U.S. based on the Golden Rule. The one with the most gold rules. It's discouraging for the rest of us.
ReplyDeleteIs there room for anymore heads in that bucket, Caro?
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, Jono, gold definitely rules in the U.S., and it looks to become even more so over the next few years. I think I'll abandon Caro to her bucket, and jump in a foxhole and pull the hole in over myself for the next 5-10 years. Things were ugly when I was a kid, and it looks to be ugly again when I'm old. At least I can be thankful we don't have (much) black plague these days...