However great the
internet is for research—and I speak as someone who’s watched the World Wide
Web develop from its first faltering ‘very-novel-but-what-use-is-it?’ steps—I
still feel there’s no substitute for the real thing. And by that I mean seeing,
smelling, touching and hearing whatever it is you’re trying to write about. Particularly when it comes to creating a sense of place.
I appreciate that
as scribblers of fiction our fundamental job is to Make Stuff Up but, even so,
adding just a tinge of authenticity to a piece of work can make all the
difference between the whole setting of the book ringing false or true.
Knowing that when they
leave port to cross the Irish Sea in the fast catamaran ferries, anybody
standing on the narrow rear deck tends to disappear in a cloud of diesel smoke
is, to me, a nice little titbit of information. I used it in ROAD KILL: Charlie Fox book five.
A throwaway line, as was mention of the rooster tail rainbows that sparkled
behind each hull at full throttle.
For every book
there is something similar, but different. Like discovering that the open-plan
café near the entrance to the New England Aquarium fills the immediate
vicinity with the smell of fried fish. Or that the Boston Harbor Hotel has
padded wallpaper in the lobby. That came into SECOND SHOT: book six.
Until I was
actually shown around the giant scrapyard in New Orleans, known locally as
Southern Scrap, I would never have thought to set one of the pivotal scenes of DIE EASY: book ten there.
Next best thing to
seeing and experiencing for yourself is talking to someone who’s been there,
done that—preferably an expert in their field rather than merely a keyboard
hero.
For ABSENCE OF LIGHT: a
Charlie Fox novella I was lucky enough to spend some time with a leading
Home Office pathologist who headed up various Disaster Victim Identification
teams after major earthquakes. The snippet there was the symbols painted on the
outside of buildings to indicate they’d been cleared or if there was a body left
inside. Of course, I took this information and ran with it in my own direction,
but the basis of truth is there.
And now I’m on with
the next in the Charlie Fox series, tentatively titled FOX HUNTER. The book is
partly set in Jordan, which I visited last year, and in Bulgaria, from whence I
have just returned almost in one
piece—long story. And there I learned not only about the area, but some little
bits of info that I doubt I would have found out without actually going myself.
One was what it
feels like to ride a skidoo through the forest at night. Amazing, is the first
thing, and like riding a big cruiser motorcycle with a rear puncture, is the
second.
And one of the
other remarkable discoveries was what is freely available to buy in the tourist
stores on the main street—knives, extendible batons, CS gas and tasers. Exactly
the kind of info I needed …
So, my question
this week is, what’s the most fascinating bit of information you’ve either set
out to discover—or stumbled upon by accident and had one of those “Eureka!”
moments—while either reading a book or researching one? How do you do most of your research? And what was your best
or worst research experience? Have you ever wondered, when reading a book, how much is made up about a location, how much is gleaned from the internet, and how much is taken from real life?
This week’s Word of the Week, is eureka, which is most commonly
recognised as the exclamation made by Greek scholar Archimedes when he stepped
into his bath and realised that the amount of water displaced by his body meant
that the volume of irregular shaped objects could now be measured with
precision. It comes from the Greek heúrēka,
meaning “I have found (it)”
Agreed, Zoe. We try to visit every place we write about - to get the feel, the smell, the taste. We take photos and copious notes - and much of that never actually gets in a book, but we believe the feel does.
ReplyDeleteHi Stan.
DeleteYup. I always do heaps of research, then aim to leave about 90% of it out ...
My worst research experience was proving beyond all doubt that a woman in high heels and stilettos cannot climb out a skip..... I haven't tested if a man so dressed could manage it... Stan? Jeff? Michael?
ReplyDeleteI believe Stiletto Jeff *IS* the man to mythbust this one!
DeleteI always saw Jeff more as a kitten heels kind of a guy Everett ...
DeleteErm, not sure I could climb out of a skip wearing both high heels AND stilettos, Caro.
DeleteI once got locked into an office building and had to climb out of an upper-storey window and then make my way to safety over the rooftops, though. Does that count? :))
Personally, folks, I find it far easier when rousting myself out of a dumpster in the mornings to toss my Jimmy Choos out first, then kick myself up and over the side much as I would into a zodiac from the sea. As for kitten heels, I prefer them only on patent leather black boots accessorized by an appropriate cat-o-nine-tails ala Pussy Galore.
DeleteThat should give you some idea of my research methods:).
Now THAT is a mental image I simply cannot get out of my head, Jeff. Thanks for putting it there ...
DeletePS - post pictures.
Will you be demonstrating this method at Bouchercon? Can I sell the video at specialist outlets?
ReplyDeleteAgain?
DeleteWait -- he's done this before and I missed it? Damn!
Delete