Showing posts with label Genocide. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Genocide. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 2, 2020

VACCINES--HOW A MILLENNIA-OLD LIFESAVER WAS AND STILL IS CONTROVERSIAL: Part 2

 Anti-vaxxers are nothing new

Opposition to vaccination is not a 20th-21st century phenomenon. It has been prevalent for much longer than many may realize. Here's an intriguing anti-vaccination flyer from 1807 called "The Vaccine Monster," clearly designed to engender feelings of suspicion, disgust and fear.

Image of "The Vaccine Monster," a hideous animal carrying various infectious diseases
The Vaccine Monster, 1807 (Image: Wiki Digital Methods)

The text that accompanied this image proclaimed that, "A mighty and horrible monster, with the horns of a bull, the hind of a horse, the jaws of a krakin, the teeth and claws of a tyger, the tail of a cow, all the evils of Pandora's box in his belly, plague, pestilence, leprosy, purple blotches, foetid ulcers, and filthy running sores covering his body . . . has made his appearance in the world, and devores mankind —especially poor helpless infants—not by sores only, or hundreds, or thousands, but by hundreds of thousands." 

Another flyer from 1894 was accompanied by text warning of the dangers of vaccination.

(Image originally from Historical Medical Library of The College
of Physicians of Philadelphia)


Notice the reference to vaccines being poison and not only ineffective, but actually producing death. Most important is this sentence: "Any dogma of a class, medical or religious, that needs the fostering care of legislative enactment to force it upon the people, shows inherent weakness and condemns it at once among all men." It also claims that the smallpox vaccine caused greater mortality than smallpox itself. 

A Supreme Court Case

In Part 1 of this two-part series, we saw how important the smallpox vaccine became as a preventive measure against a grossly disfiguring and highly contagious disease. By 1902, smallpox vaccination was well established in Boston. Nevertheless, the disease stubbornly hung around, and officials took drastic measures. For instance, public health doctors, accompanied by guards, went to the railway yards and forcibly vaccinated “Italians, negroes and other employees.”

In 1902, Cambridge's Board of Health mandated smallpox vaccination for all residents who had not been vaccinated since 1897. But a naturalized Swedish American called Reverend Henning Jacobson refused to take the vaccination, claiming that Sweden's mandatory vaccination when he was six years old had caused him "great and extreme suffering." He was convicted and fined $5, which he refused to pay. 


                                            Henning Jacobson (Image: New England Historical Society)


In a legal brief, Jacobson stated he rejected a law that compelled ". . . a man to offer up his body to pollution and filth and disease," on the basis of the 14th Amendment, which states in part, "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States."  Of note, Jacobson made dire references to vaccinations ("filth and disease") that echoed those of the 1807 "Vaccine Monster" flyer. The Jacobson case went to the U.S. Supreme Court, which held that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state. Jacobson lost the case.

But in 1926, a group of health officers who went to Georgetown, DE to vaccinate the townspeople were met by an armed mob led by a retired Army Lieutenant and a city councilman. The "vaccinators" were driven out. If any of the residents of Georgetown were aware of the 1905 Supreme Court ruling, it evidently made no difference to the ire directed against the authorities.

In 1935, two separate polio vaccine trials using killed and attenuated poliovirus resulted in catastrophic morbidity and mortality in many subjects out of the 11,000 total number of people vaccinated. This doesn't say vaccines are bad; rather it emphasizes the absolute importance of conducting careful trials before a large number of people are administered a vaccine. In 1953, Jonas Salk produced an injected vaccine for polio using a killed virus, and in fact he injected his own family members with it. In 1959, Albert Sabin brought out his oral attenuated virus, which was tried out on, strangely enough, Soviet citizens. In modern times, only the inactivated (injected) poliovirus is used in the U.S., while other countries use the oral form. Throughout the 1900s, many of the vaccines with which we've come to be familiar, e.g. mumps, measles, rubella, rabies, diphtheria, pertussis, meningitis, and chickenpox were developed. In 1972, the smallpox vaccine was no longer routinely administered in the U.S. 

The "Case" Against Vaccines

The objections and resistance to vaccination fall into a number of categories:

  • Religion: It isn't that multiple Christian denominations like Roman Catholic, Amish, Anglican, Episcopalian, have an official stance against vaccination. They do not. What we see is the individual who believes that "God is more powerful than any virus," or some similar declaration. These people refuse vaccinations on the basis of their faith. All but two US states allow vaccination exemption on the basis of religion.
  • Misconceptions: Just as in foregoing centuries, some believe that vaccines actually give a person the disease or even cause death. This is still the case with the annual influenza vaccine. I have personally taken it every year for more than 20 years, but people still swear (including a surprising number of people in health care) that whenever they get the flu shot, they get the flu. It isn't true. There may be a mild local or systemic reaction, but it is not the flu.
  • Concerns about adverse effects: In 1998, Andrew Wakefield published a study in the influential British medical journal, The Lancet, claiming to show that the mumps-measles-rubella (MMR) vaccine could be associated with the development of autism in twelve children. What followed was a circus of accusations and conspiracy theories that the manufacturers of the MMR vaccine were hiding the truth about its causing autism. When the cause of a disease is unknown, those affected will readily latch onto any explanation offered, no matter how flawed. Wakefield's paper was deeply flawed, yet it took The Lancet 12 years to officially retract it. However, humans being what they are, a planted seed puts down deep roots and continues to grow unabated.
  • Fear of vaccine ingredients: in 1926, Alexander Glenny increased the effectiveness of the diphtheria toxoid by treating it with aluminum salts. Called an adjuvant, this increases the immune response in a subject. Much later, in 1964, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended aluminum adjuvant in the combination diptheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine. The amount of aluminum salts contained is in fact less than the amount in normal human breast milk, but many people are under the impression that there are pieces of the metal aluminum floating around in the vaccine. Like the MMR vaccine itself, thimerasol, a preservative containing ethyl mercury, was implicated--falsely--to autism. Since 2001, thimerasol hasn't been used in children's vaccines, although it is still used in the adult flu vaccine unless preservative-free vaccine is specifically requested.
  • Immune overload: Many parents falsely believe that the multiple immunizations given to children at a single doctor visit is detrimental to a child because their immune system can't handle them all at once.
  • Genocidal agent: prevalent in Africa especially is the belief that vaccines are really an attempt by western countries to kill off black Africans. Most recently, this conspiracy theory has been applied to the putatively upcoming Covid vaccine, and of interest is that Bill Gates is central to that plot. But don't scoff at Africans just yet. Since Gates famously predicted a pandemic back in 2015, some Americans also believe that he started the pandemic himself. (Others decry why he shows up on CNN talking about medical issues when he is not a physician.). But guess what? President Barack Obama actually beat Gates to it (at least on YouTube) when he precisely foresaw a global airborne pandemic such as Covid back in 2014.

Individual Liberty

All those above reasons aside, a powerful theme that has run through the anti-vaxxer's cry from way back in the 1800s until the present day is a strong objection to being told what to do by authorities. People go to a physician for a sore throat and demand antibiotics, but being asked to take a vaccine to prevent illness is a different matter. That is an imposition on one's freedoms, as is wearing a mask to prevent spread of Covid. There are emotional, cultural, and ideological objections to vaccination. Conservative people are less likely to accept or recommend vaccination. Donald Trump has used Twitter to perpetuate the long-debunked linkage between autism and vaccines since as far back as March 2012. However, a well-known liberal, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. also was a vaccine skeptic. 

Suspicion of government and the perception that authorities are trying to take away personal freedoms are often tied to any number of dark conspiracy theories. These are sometimes triggered by signals from sharply partisan individuals with a platform, such as conservative TV and radio hosts, celebrities such as Jenny McCarthy, and leaders such as President Trump, who has cast aspersions on the CDC, for example. The tangle of ideology, politics, and conspiracy theories is complex, and unfortunately it can have negative and dangerous consequences when it comes to vaccines and vaccination. Since the 19th century, we have made tremendous progress in science and technology, but for some, that "Vaccine Monster" of 1807 is still a reality. 

(Addendum: A correction was made to reflect that the Robert Kennedy who is a vaccine skeptic refers to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.)


Monday, January 14, 2013

One Million Bones


Today's post is a first for us here on Murder is Everywhere: it's been written by a guest who doesn't write crime fiction.



Jane McPherson is a doctoral candidate in social work and human rights at Florida State University -- and the principal organizer of One Million Bones Florida. That said, she is no stranger to the community of authors. Jane's father is William McPherson whose novel, Testing the Current was just called “a flawless literary achievement” by The Atlantic Monthly; and her husband, Jon Jefferson, is the writer-half of Jefferson Bass, author of six New York Times best-selling crime novels.  She is also fond of the work (and the company) of her two high-school-aged children, Nathaniel and Ursula, who, she assures me, are good writers, too.

The numbers, in brackets, in the text, all refer to links that you can (and should) click on. You'll find them all at the bottom of the page.

What's One Million Bones?

Read on.

Leighton - Monday


Some murders are just more fun to read about than others. I like to read about murders in my favorite cities, like Valencia, Spain, and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  These are exotic murders of bullfighting stars



(Thank you, Jason Webster, for Or the Bull Kills You)

or brutal crimes that are resolved by clever kidnapping victims who steamily sex their captors to death



(Hats off to Luiz Alfredo Garcia-Roza for Silence of the Rain).

Real murder—especially the cynical, political slaughter of thousands—is a lot less entertaining—and yet much more important to understand, to intervene in, and to prevent. To effectively prevent mass atrocities, we need to know the stories of men, women and children who are massacred, violated, and displaced in places like Syria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sudan, and Burma.

This piece[1] posted by United to End Genocide[2] gives an overview of world’s atrocities as we came to the end of 2012, but it focuses on numbers, policies, and geography—we get no narrative, no stories about individual people who are affected. 


One Million Bones,[3] a national arts-activism project, endeavors to create emotional, personal connections between people in powerful countries like the U.S., and the victims an ocean away.


Here[4] Naomi Natale, the founding artist of One Million Bones, tells the story of Ashta, a young mother now living in a refugee camp in Chad.


One Million Bones engages participants in the fight against genocide and other human rights abuses with a very simple action:  We make replicas of human bones from clay. 


The bones are powerful in two ways:

First, through a partnership with Students Rebuild,[5] each bone we make raises $1 (USD) for CARE International’s[6] services to survivors in Congo and Somalia. As of New Year’s Day 2013, we’d made over 450,000 bones—and therefore raised $450,000 for services—with the help of volunteers in all 50 U.S. states and 11 countries.  (You can track our progress[1] towards 1,000,000 bones on the Students Rebuild home page.)


Second, the bones are made to be seen, first in cities and towns where they are made, and finally, in Washington, DC, on Saturday, June 8th, 2013. 


Stunning videos document the laying down of bones in Albuquerque[2] and Tallahassee,[3] but these remarkable installations will be dwarfed by the installation on the National Mall. Imagine: One million bones.


Mukweso Mwenene[4], originally from the Democratic Republic of Congo and now living in Tallahassee, Florida, knows the sight of human bones:  He has seen the evidence of massacres. “But in my country,” he says, “the skeletons are all in the closet.” Mukweso will be with us in June when we evoke an enormous mass grave on the National Mall—a giant petition calling for an end to genocide through prevention and intervention.

You should join us, too! We need volunteers to make bones[5], to organize events[6], and we need at least 4,000 people to lay 1,000,000 bones on the National Mall.  You can sign up here[7] to help in DC.

Help us connect a voice and a story to every clay bone.