Jeff––Saturday
This past week, mystery fans from around the world came together
in Nashville, Tennessee to celebrate the 55th annual Bouchercon World
Mystery Convention. Bouchercon is a particularly
meaningful get-together to us at Murder is Everywhere because BCON 2009 is where
MIE came into being…at the instigation of the late, great Leighton Gage – a gentleman,
scholar, motivator, dynamite author, and all-round nice guy. [That's Leighton's photo, second from the top on the photo masthead to the right.]
I think it’s only fitting that the #1 most popular post in our fifteen years history is one put up by Leighton. So, in honor of his continuing star-power draw, here’s that #1 post, “The Death of Percy Fawcett” put up on February 14, 2010.
Do you notice any similarity between these gentlemen?
No, neither do I.
But Paramount has chosen Brad Pitt to play Percy Fawcett in an upcoming version of David Grann’s non-fiction book The Lost City of Z. It’s going to be, according to them, an Amazonian mystery/thriller.
And
that virtually guarantees to muddy the waters still further about the
death of the English explorer who was swallowed up by the Brazilian
jungle back in 1925.
Grann, in his book, doesn’t really solve the mystery of what happened to Fawcett.
But he does reject the account of Orlando Villas-Bôas.
Orlando, who died in 2002, was a sertanista, a kind of wilderness explorer peculiar to Brazil, and the country’s Indian expert par excellence.
He spent many years living among the tribes, spoke their languages,
established first contact with many of them, and was instrumental in
determining a just government policy toward all the indigenous peoples.
I knew Orlando Villas-Bôas personally. He
was neither a liar nor a boaster, and his life was packed with more
adventure than that of anyone I ever knew. Why, then, should he make
things up? Orlando
claimed (and I believed him) to have heard the true story of what
happened to Fawcett from one of the murderers, a member of the Kalapalos
tribe.
Grann visited the Kalapalos in 2005 and got an “oral account” of the incident.
Orlando was there 54 years earlier, in 1951, and spoke to people who were there at the time.
Both
accounts agree in some regards: They agree that Fawcett and his men
stayed in the village of the Kalapalos. They agree that Fawcett and his
companions had a mishap on the river and lost most of the gifts they’d
bought to placate the Indians. They agree that most of the members of
Fawcett’s expedition were sick by the time they contacted the Kalapalos.
(And, therefore, a danger to the tribe.)
Then the two accounts begin to differ.
According
to Grann, the expedition set off to the eastward. The tribesmen, he
said, warned Fawcett not to go that way, because the region was
inhabited by “fierce Indians”. But Fawcett decided otherwise. And
disappeared. End of story. (And this is going to make a
mystery/thriller?)
Grann, however, does not relate, and
perhaps never discovered, three additional precipitating incidents. And
those incidents, for Orlando Villas-Bôas, were of more moment than
sickness and/or the absence of gifts. According to Orlando:
- Jack
Fawcett, Percy’s son, urinated in the river upstream of the
village, upstream of where the Kalapalos drew their drinking water.
It was an affront to the entire tribe to do so.
- One of the members of Fawcett’s expedition shot a small animal. They brought it into the village and hung it up by a cord to preserve the meat from insects and small scavengers. One of the Indians came along and tried to remove a piece of the meat. An expedition member pushed him away. Another affront. The Kalapalos share food. Not to do is unacceptable behavior.
- A small child approached the white men and started playing with their goods. They pushed the child away. The child came back and did it again. One of the white men, in the European custom of the time, struck the child. And that was the greatest affront of all. The Kalapalos never strike their children.
That final incident, according to Orlando,
sealed the fate of Fawcett and his men. The Indians waited until the
next morning, allowed the expedition to get some distance down the trail
and then ambushed and killed them all.
Orlando
told me one thing more: in those days, he said, the Kalapalos didn’t
lie. They dissembled, but they never told an untruth. He’d asked a
direct question, for which he didn’t receive a direct answer. Thus he
knew from the get-go there was something afoot. It took him, he said,
hours and hours of conversation to extract a frank account of what had
really happened.
We sure as hell aren’t going to get one from Hollywood.
––Jeff, re-posting Leighton
The film seemed to be generally well received, but lost money. I haven't seen it. I think I prefer reading Leighton's account of what happened!
ReplyDeleteWhat amazed me was how energized so many remain to this day over which version of the "facts" is accurate.
DeleteFrom AA: Thank you for this, Jeff. From time to time, I have noticed, people who read the original are coming back and commenting on it. There are pages and pages of comments. At the beginning our dear Leighton was here to answer them. But commenters continue to come back and come back and to hash out the latest theories about this mystery. There are pages and pages of opinions and notes from still interested parties. Those interested can find the fascinating, lengthy discussion here: https://murderiseverywhere.blogspot.com/2010/02/death-of-percy-fawcett.html
ReplyDeleteI have never stopped missing him.