Following the art theme of the
blogs this week I walked round my house and looked at the pictures on the walls
and noticed there were two distinct themes, either horses or woods. Over my fire is the very common print of The Three
Kings. For some reason when I was wee I
was a big fan of Arkle who is not as famous as his two fellow subjects (Red Rum
and Desert Orchid) in the painting but
it’s nice that he’s there all the same. Arkle’s owner famously said that she
loved him too much to ever run him in the Grand National in case he came to
harm.
The Three Kings by Susan Crawford
My favourite picture of all is a
tiny print in a simple wood frame with a typed label on the back. It hung over my granny’s sideboard for many
years. It has been a constant in my life, a feeling that I want to live in that house down this lane.
My granny too said it was her
favourite picture. Yet it is so small,
so unprepossessing, with no mount around it, no fancy frame. It’s held together
by a bit of string. It’s not even a painting. It’s not even very good. The
brown paper on the back looks as though it came from a paper bag and it is crumpled,
torn and repeatedly stained with watermarks from the floods when my granny’s
neighbours upstairs left their bath running.
Only 10 " by 8",
But the picture is beguiling. Enchanting.
I’m not sure if the picture is
one of extreme calm or imminent threat. There is no light coming through the
tree canopy, it’s all dark. There is a single winding path that is waterlogged
leading up to a tiny cottage that may or may not have a thatched roof. The path seems to wind its way beyond the
cottage into the only area of light so the viewer’s eye is taken from the
darkness and into the light. From that
point of view, the viewer has found themselves in the middle of the forest and
faces a long walk to get out.
Even the way I wrote that ‘has
found themselves’. … How did they get
there?
The
floor is covered in bluebells so it is spring and the trees are green but
goodness knows how awful it would be in the winter. There is a sense of
contented isolation about it and I’m sure this picture was in my mind when I
wrote about the isolated cottage in Blood of Crows. But the picture asks a lot of questions. Who
lives in that wee cottage? Why do they
live in such a remote place? If you were brutally murdered there, would any
body hear you scream. Would anybody find you if you were buried in amongst the
bluebells? Forensic topography would
mean nothing here. A mobile phone
will not work here. You will be at the mercy of the spirits of the forest and the wood
elves.
And the biggest question of all,
if my granny liked it so much, why isn’t it in a nicer frame?
There is something of fairytale
darkness about it, of Hansel and Gretel, and the Little Red Riding Hood. It is
Grimm, if you pardon the pun.
I keep coming back to the
isolation, the sense that you are on your own and you will either rise or fall
but it will be by your own hand.
My gran, the owner of the picture,
was orphaned as she was born, the youngest of 13 children and grew up in an
orphanage. With her closest sisters, they lived together as a unit, with a house
mother in a ‘small cottage’ somewhere
outside Sheffield. There they learned to cook and sew and clean with a view to
going into service. She dreamed of being a seamstress, always darned everything.
I mean everything.
She never said a bad word about the
orphanage, the ‘cottage homes’ as the system was called. They had food in their
bellies and many folk didn’t in the north of England in those days ( we are
talking early 1900 here). She grew up being terrified of ending up in the
workhouse (which was what the Southern General of last week’s post was originally
built for.) and while researching some pictures for the blog I realised why;
the workhouses and the cottage homes were both part of the action on poverty at
that time. So the home was not just for
orphans, but for children whose families could no longer afford to keep them.
And it was a label of social
disgrace. But Yorkshire girls are tough and I don’t think my gran ever noticed
or if she did, she didn’t care. The only thing I heard her comment on occasionally,
was the cruelty of the local village children to the cottage home children.
They would bully and taunt the orphanage kids. It was a five mile walk, over
rough ground, often in snow, from the orphanage to the school. The cottage
children wore leather boots all year round. The boots were good quality and handed
over from child to child as the foot
size changed, to cope with the long walk
to lessons – and the boots were the badge of ‘being different’ was how she put
it.
All her life she stood up for the underdog and
taking this literally, would come home with unwanted puppies and stray dogs with bits missing. She
had a difficult life, moving to Glasgow to live in a Govan tenement over run
with mice, being widowed and left with
three children but she never lost her ‘we never died a winter yet’ attitude.
Don’t get me wrong, she wasn’t a sweet nice little granny, she was more your
functional granny. She was a strict disciplinarian and would bruise my knuckles
by rapping them with a wooden spoon, when I misbehaved at the tea table.
Which
was often.
At thirteen, the girls had to
leave the cottage home to go out to work and in her first week of being a
junior housemaid, she was crossing a road, avoiding a young man cutting a
hedge. He took one look and said to her, ‘Are you Jessie Cadwallander’. It was
one of her older brothers and the whole family slowly got back together again.
Only to be ripped apart by two
world wars.
She was never one for looking
back. She died at 105 without a bit of
dementia, and apart from sight loss and hearing issues, she was in good health. It said on her death certificate ‘extreme old
age’. And that canny be a bad thing.
Her secret to a long life? She
didn’t drink ( one advocaat at Christmas and even then she couldn’t finish it
as it was too strong). She always had a four legged companion somewhere. She worked
hard (still in the community canteen in her seventies). She had, because of
poverty, what we would call a good diet.
She was green fingered and grew everything. Red meat was a rare thing. She ate fish, porridge and every morning started with a glass of water with a lemon squeezed
into it. Her number one tip, be content with your own company. She was never
ever lonely although she had few friends and lived on her own for the last fifty
years of her life.
Which brings us back to the picture, and the
isolation of that house, and the carpet
of bluebells.
And where do I live now? In a house across the road from the woods that are known
on the map as the bluebell woods. Every morning the dog and I go up there to be
on our own. We don’t need company so we
walk up on the high ground away from the handbag dogs and anything that ends
with ‘doodle.’
I think it might be in the genes.
Caro Ramsay 24 04 2015
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI love the picture, too, Caro. And the story!
ReplyDeleteYou, Caro? Misbehave at the tea table? I'm shocked. Lovely column, though it's what I've come to expect from you. :)
ReplyDeleteI read your post right after it went up, Caro, but I couldn't think of what to say. I've thought about it off and on all day. There's no punch line coming, just a sincere bit of awe at how well you captured the essence of a possible temporal link to your Granny's soul. It's impossible to read your post and not wonder what it was about that picture that captured her...and now her granddaughter.
ReplyDeleteCaro, thank you for telling us your granny's story. Your both having such a connection to that picture can't have an explanation in words. Wordsmiths that we all are, there are some human connections that take place in parts of us where there are no words. We may feel compelled to communicate the what and why of them, but we will fall short. That's why we need pictures. I see you and your granny and the picture and peace. It's lovely.
ReplyDeleteWhat a wonderful story. I love the art, too, but I can't get over how specially blessed you were with a granny like that.
ReplyDelete