You’ve just got to love a great storyteller!
The other day I was
wandering around Denver helping a friend look for a real estate investment when
I stumbled upon a map shop in the Cherry Creek area. I had to go in.
I love maps and have several wonderful maps of Africa on my wall, including
a 1587 printing of a 1570 Ortelius.
It is extraordinary – the accuracy of the shape of the continent is
remarkable, particularly as it was done primarily through observation and
drawing.
Ortelius map of 1570 |
I chatted to the proprietor
about maps in general, and maps of Africa in particular. He showed me what he had in stock, but
I found nothing to really interest me.
One of the topics discussed was how remarkably accurate very old maps
were, despite no one being able to determine longitude with any accuracy. He said the outlines of landmasses were
decent but the interiors were all guesswork.
Part of Cram's map showing Mount Hercules |
He pulled out a map (circa
1895) by the well known American cartographer George Cram. It shows the relative lengths of the
world’s major rivers and the relative heights of the world’ highest
mountains. In general, it was
pretty accurate, EXCEPT for one mountain: Mount Hercules in New Guinea,
towering a thousand metres or so (3,700 feet) above Mt. Everest. “Cram had never been to New Guinea,”
the proprietor said. “He believed
what he was told.”
Needless to say, I had to
find out why such a well known cartographer had bought into a story so
thoroughly that he put a non-existent mountain on one of his maps – not just a
non-existent one, but one that was significantly higher than the highest known
mountain.
Let me tell you about Captain
John Lawson.
Despite a European presence
in the East from the late 1400’s, there was much that was unknown. One area that had captured the
imagination of Europeans was New Guinea, about which very little was known and
a great deal imagined. It was
exotic and far away.
Joseph Beete Jukes, an
officer on HMS Fly that explored the
coast of New Guinea in the 1840s, wrote:
I know of no part of the world, the
exploration of which is so flattering to the imagination, so likely to be
fruitful in interesting results, whether to the naturalist, the ethnologist or
the geographer, and altogether so well calculated to gratify the enlightened
curiosity of an adventurous explorer, as the interior of New Guinea. New
Guinea! The very mention of being taken into the interior of New Guinea sounds
like being allowed to visit some of the enchanted regions of the Arabian
Nights, so dim an atmosphere of obscurity rests at present on the wonders it
probably contains.
In 1875 an
explorer by the name of John Lawson published a book of his travels in New
Guinea. His achievements as told
in Wanderings in the Interior of New Guinea
(Chapman
& Hall) were awe-inspiring.
He had walked, save for
about 30 miles, across the island at its widest point; he climbed Mt. Hercules
up to its snowline (in one day); he mapped vast tracts of the interior,
including Lake Alexandrina and the Gladstone and Royal rivers; and he lost
three of his five assistants to horrible deaths. For food, his party lived off the land. They fished, at one point catching over
100 in two hours; they hunted, once bringing down 19 ducks with two shots. And when their rifle was lost, survived
by hitting quail with a stick. He
discovered many new species of flora and fauna, and shot and killed a giant
striped tiger, which he called the Moolah.
Sketch from Lawson's book |
His story was very
believable, at least to the general public – he described species in minute
detail (for example, five page to an new trapdoor spider), but often made
entries in his journal such as “Passing over exactly the same kind of country
as yesterday. Still less forest”. This juxtaposing of detail and dismissive comments seemed real to readers in England.
However the story was not so
believable to other explorers and scientists. Even though the book sold well, a number of prominent
publications like The Times, Geographical Magazine, and Athenaeum
ran articles decrying it. The famous British naturalist,
explorer, geographer, anthropologist and biologist, Alfred Russel Wallace,
reviewed the book in Nature, writing
that he had “a duty to inform our readers that it is wholly fictitious. It is
not even a clever fiction”.
In response to a derisory
review in the Athenaeum that included
a statement that the coordinates of the village from which Lawson had launched
his expedition were actually in the middle of the ocean, Lawson retorted: “The
gentleman who wrote this article knows nothing whatever about New Guinea,
except such information as he has gleaned from text-books and gazetteers of
doubtful accuracy”.
Even the Alpine Club weighed
in, saying that Lawson’s ascent of Mt. Hercules was three or four times faster
than one could do Mont Blanc.
Lawson's response: "My
ascent of Mount Hercules has, also, provoked something more than mere
astonishment in the minds of the delicate city gentlemen and podgy professors
who are in the habit of ascending Mont Blanc, with the aid of sherry and
sandwiches, and half-a-dozen greasy, garlic-fed guides, and then devoting a quarto
volume to an account of their exploits."
When the famous explorer
Captain Moresby wrote a letter solemnly proclaimed that Lawson’s claims were unfounded and
supported his position by saying that he (Moresby) had never seen the species
described by Lawson, Lawson again went on the attack:
“A due sense of modesty
should have kept [Captain Moresby] silent, especially as he is not a qualified
judge as to what is or what is not to be found in the interior of New Guinea …
“We never saw,” “we never saw”; when Capt. Moresby does see, he will be deeply
mortified to think he is numbered amongst those who have tried to throw
discredit upon my narrative.”
Lawson eventually went
silent when he was invited by the editor of the Athenaeum to produce the skin of the Moolah he had shot.
Lawson’s book was obviously
pulling everyone’s chain, and he must have delighted in the reactions of so
many prominent people, particularly those who pontificated but had never left
the shores of England.
Mount Hercules from Wallace's book |
So that is the story of how cartographer
George Cram got sucked in to publishing his erroneous map. It just goes to show that even in those non-Internet days so long ago, one could not believe everything one read. Needless to say, I bought the map.
There’s one other footnote
of interest. There was no Captain Lawson in the English navy at the time.
To this day, no one knows who the real author was of Wanderings in the Interior of New Guinea.
Next
time I am going to tell you of another wondrous Lawson - an American of truly astounding vision.
Stan -
Thursday
Note: I read a lot about Captain Lawson in Oceanic encounters, a scientific
collaboration between the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
and the Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies (RSPAS) at The Australian
National University.
Stan, WOW! What a story. What fun to read. I loved the suspense and especially enjoyed the "podgy professors who are in the habit of ascending Mont Blanc, with the aid of sherry and sandwiches." Whoever wrote the Lawson book did a lively job of it.
ReplyDeleteA couple of coincidences that I cannot help but mention: I fell in love with maps as a child when I studied the atlas and dreamed of faraway places. They still appear to me, especially old ones, as some of the most romantic objects there are. AND, after talking with you about it, I got the Netflick of "Black and White in Color" to watch it again. There was a bonus movie on the disc, which I watched just last evening: "The Sky Above, the Mud Below," about Brits and Dutchmen traversing New Guinea!!
Thanks, Annamaria. Did my build up of Black and White in Color hold up when you watched it?
ReplyDeleteThanks so much for your story and the information about the map shop in Denver. I live near Denver and have maps of several battles of the Russo-Japanese War printed in Berlin in 1908 which were in a box of books that belonged to my dad. Now I know where to find out more about them. Maps are stories within themselves.
ReplyDeleteStan, yes it held up. Just as absurdly funny as I remembered. But there are tragicomic parts too that didn't stick with me from years ago. Par for the course for my hyper optimistic attitude! I am glad to have seen it a again.
ReplyDeleteWouldn't it be delightful to learn who John Lawson really was? Now, if Murdock were around in those days...
ReplyDeleteI bought Cram's Atlas in a used book store years ago. I've wondered about this Mount Hercules.
ReplyDelete