Michael - Thursday
This week Germany and Namibia announced a deal whereby Germany would pay around $1.5 billion dollars in reparations to Namibia for the
genocide that they executed there at the beginning of the twentieth century. It
sounds like a lot of money, and it would seem to bring to a close a shameful chapter
in Germany’s colonial history. Except that it really doesn’t.
Let’s start at the beginning.
At the end of the 19th century, the scramble for Africa was in full swing and Germany was settling the area now known as Namibia – then Deutsch-Südwestafrika (German South West Africa). The area they chose was currently occupied by the Herero and Nama peoples. Initially, fraudulent deals were made to buy stretches of land, but soon the German authorities grabbed the Herero’s land, forced them to work, and stole their cattle. The cattle probably angered the people the most. Cattle are central to Herero life and culture. (The Herero language doesn’t have a huge vocabulary, but there are over a thousand words for the colours, shapes, and designs of markings on cattle.) To cut a long and very painful story short, when the German forces went south to deal with trouble there, the Hereros rebelled and killed 100 German settlers (but spared the women and children). Later the Namas followed suit. Fourteen thousand troops were sent from Germany, and at the Battle of Waterberg, the Hereros were defeated - killed, captured, or driven into the desert.
After that, the Germans implemented a deliberate policy to exterminate the Herero and the Nama. Any caught were enslaved or executed. Women and children were driven into the desert without food or water. Upwards of 100,000 people died. Corpses were taken to German for “race science” experiments. The first genocide of the twentieth century was the direct precursor of Hitler’s “final solution.”
The Kaiser's Holocaust: Germany's Forgotten Genocide and the Colonial Roots of Nazism by Casper Erichsen and David Olusoga is a powerful history of that time and those events. They are also movingly woven into Tony Park’s partly historical and partly modern day thriller Ghosts of the Past.
So why has Germany’s 1.1 billion euro offer been
controversial?
The most powerful argument against the settlement comes from
leaders of the Herero and Nama populations themselves, minorities in Namibia.
They claim that their role in the negotiations has been only consultative and
that they don’t support this agreement, which they call an insult. They refer to the settlements Germany reached with Jewish peoples after the Second World
War, pointing out that they didn’t only negotiate with Israel, but with
surviving families and the diaspora. They reject the settlement, and are
currently pursuing a case against Germany in New York.
![]() |
| Battle of the Waterberg |
I have a lot of sympathy with the reaction of the Herero and Nama peoples. After all, they were the ones whose forefathers (and mothers) were killed in awful ways. It’s a precedent that needs to be set. And let’s not kid ourselves that this is a German issue. Every colonial power was responsible for something similar. And what about the Native Americans, the Aborigines of Australia, and black Americans whose ancestors were enslaved? There needs to be something more than apologies and shoving statues out of sight. Is it really supposed to be a coincidence that all the modern decedents of these groups remain disadvantaged?






