Brilliant or Stupid

Annamaria on Monday 

This post is inspired by a conversation I had with Stan Trollip that began with lamb chops and ended (as my conversations with Dr. Stanley Trollip so often do) with my learning something really interesting and fun to know.  I share now, here my new knowledge about the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

I was complaining to Stan about how many ignoramuses think they ought to be in charge.  That is what Dr. David Dunning and Dr. Jason S. Kruger studied - the relationship between how much a person knows about a topic and how confident that person is likely to be.  Their conclusion: the less people know about a topic, the more confident they are.  And the more they know about it, the less confidence the have.

Here is a quick explanation of how this works:

Explanation 

This explains so much. All those overconfident nincompoops who stupefy us with their conviction. The kids who fail the exam because they think they already know the subject and therefor don't study. And perhaps we ourselves, thinking things are easy for everyone because they're easy for us.  There are the overconfident software engineers who think of themselves as brilliant and end up making it impossible to get this paragraph back to left-aligned.  

But I digress.

As a writer, this topic makes me how mystery authors might find this topic interesting when creating characters.  In our genre, we often see the over confidence character in stories where the private detective has to deal with overconfident police inspector. But what about making a story with buddy private detectives, one who thinks his own brilliance is nothing special and the other one who thinks of himself as genius.  I am not saying I could write such a thing, but I think it would be a lot of fun to read such a story. 

 Stan urged me to include John Cleese in my search, something I knew I would enjoy.  I think you will like it too.   

Dumb or Smarrt

 

Interesting times

Stanley - Thursday

These turbulent times, particularly in the United States, are good cause to revisit the Dunning-Kruger effect and to remind ourselves of its consequences.

Simply put, the Dunning-Kruger effect states that people of lower ability think they know more than they do and consequently have an illusion of superiority. They lack the meta-cognitive skills of reflection, which results in them not knowing what they don't know.

The effect was described by social psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger, in a 1999 study titled Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments. Apparently the idea for the study came from the case of bank robber McArthur Wheeler, who robbed banks with his face covered with lemon juice, which he believed would make it invisible to the surveillance cameras. This belief was based on his misunderstanding of the chemical properties of lemon juice as an invisible ink. When he was apprehended later in the day after he'd robbed two Pittsburgh banks in broad daylight and was shown the surveillance tapes, he expressed shock and exclaimed 'but I wore the juice!'

I don't know whether Wheeler won a Darwin Award. If he had it would have confirmed one of Darwin's many insights: 'Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.' (Descent of Man)

Charles Darwin

In a later study, Dunning and Kruger tested their theory on students in an introductory psychology course. They looked at how well the students assessed their performance on tests in three areas: logical reasoning, English grammar, and personal sense of humour. After receiving their results, the students were asked to estimate their rank in the class. Incompetent students estimated their rank higher than their results indicated, while competent students tended to underestimate their rank. Students who scored at about the 10th percentile estimated they'd scored at about the 60th percentile.

The two researchers also examined gun owners and found the same effect - those who scored poorly on a tests of guns and shooting wildly overestimated their expertise.

(Getty Images)

It is important to note that most Dunning and Kruger's studies were done using students in the United States. It is important because some multi-cultural studies they conducted indicated that the Dunning-Kruger effect was also influenced by cultural background. For example, Japanese students overall tended to underestimate their ability.

My memory may be faulty as to the exact numbers, but I remember reading a few years ago about one of the huge multinational tests on mathematics or science. I don't remember which. Students from the USA came about tenth in the rankings, but first in their confidence in how well they'd done.

Of course, Dunning and Kruger were not the first to notice the effect they describe. Here are a few historic examples I found on Wikipedia.

'Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance.' - Confucius

'The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool.' - William Shakespeare (As You Like It)

'A little learning is a dangerous thing.' - Alexander Pope

'Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies.' - Friedrich Nietzsche

'One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision.' - Bertrand Russell

It seems that the clash between competence and the illusion of competence is spreading far and wide with the illusionists gaining the upper hand (hopefully temporarily). The situation is exacerbated by a growing climate of anti-intellectualism, fuelled by religious extremism and cultism, and diminishing funds for education.

As Robert Kennedy said in a speech in Cape Town in June 1966: 'There is a Chinese curse which says "May he live in interesting times." Like it or not we live in interesting times.' 

Robert Kennedy (Photo: S Trollip)

Given the hubris of some of the world's leaders, I hope the times don't become too interesting.