I’ve been glued to the
news this week waiting for the next Trump time bomb to explode. The latest one
has been ticking since 2005, with yet another example of the ‘interesting’
attitude of the Republican candidate for Leader of the Free World towards
women. Honestly, you couldn’t make this stuff up.
However, things have
been equally entertaining on this side of the Atlantic over the past few days.
![]() |
| British Prime Minister Theresa May at the Dispatch Box, House of Commons |
If you’ve ever
listened to or watched Prime Minister’s Questions from the House of Commons,
you’ll know that British Members of Parliament can be a fairly rowdy lot.
There’s a good deal of heckling goes on, and it seems to be the sole purpose of
the Speaker – a post currently held by John Bercow – to try to keep some kind
of order, much like a grumpy umpire at a tennis match back when John McEnroe
was still playing.
But, if the US has
Donald Trump, we have the Labour Party, which seems to be undergoing a kind of slow-motion
self-destruct at the moment.
And now we have the
saga of two Members of the European Parliament from the UK Independence Party.
One of them is Steven Woolfe, who has served as a UKIP MEP for the North West of
England since 2014.
He is a married
father-of-one, forty-nine years old, and a barrister. (I mention these facts
only in the context that his parental status should give him some sense of
responsibility, as should his age and profession, quite apart from the fact he
is an elected representative of the people.)
The other person
involved appears to be Mike Hookem, also a UKIP MEP since the 2014 elections,
an ex-RAF Royal Engineer, and UKIP’s defence spokesman.
![]() |
| UKIP MEPs Mike Hookem (left) and Steven Woolfe |
It seems that while
they were attending the European Parliament in Strasbourg, they got into a bit
of a verbal debate during a ‘clear the air’ meeting. Mr Hookem, in an interview
on Radio 4, claimed that Mr Woolfe “took his jacket off, and said, ‘let’s take
this outside. Mano a mano’ were his
words … It was all a bit handbags at dawn.”
A newspaper reported
that Mr Woolfe claimed that 63-year-old Mr Hookem “came at me and landed a
blow.”
Mr Hookem denies punching
his colleague, adding to Channel 4 news that “I’d backed off, the door opened,
Steven Woolfe somehow fell over his own feet and fell into the room, and that
was basically it.”
Either way, a few
hours later Mr Woolfe collapsed and was taken to hospital to undergo
investigations for possible bleeding on the brain.
![]() |
| Mr Woolf collapsed at the European Parliament, Strasbourg |
It was suggested that he might have hit his head when he fell, although he was still claiming that his injuries proved he had indeed been punched. Reports now suggest that a CT scan has shown no evidence of any blood clot, and he’s due to be released shortly.
![]() |
| What part of Steven Woolfe's anatomy has UKIP leader Nigel Farage got hold of, exactly? |
Nigel Farage, who is
UKIP’s leader-on-elastic (he has stood down and stood in again several times,
including again this week when Diane James resigned after less than three weeks
in the job) said in another UK newspaper article that “I suspect it will blow
over and be looked back upon as one of these things that happens between men.”
![]() |
| I'm not saying Diane James didn't really want the job of UKIP leader, but the body language here speaks volumes ... |
The kind of thing that
men do or say in locker rooms, eh Mr Trump?
But, all this goes to
prove two important points, in my humble opinion.
The first is that
anyone who deliberately sets out to be elected to government probably should be
excluded from eligibility on those grounds alone.
And secondly, the
average man is roughly 300 percent less effective in a fistfight than he
imagines he’s going to be ...
Charlie Fox would laugh her arse off.
Charlie Fox would laugh her arse off.
This week’s Word of the
Week is argle-bargle, which
originates from the Scottish phrase argy-bargy,
meaning anywhere from a lively discussion or relatively amicable if somewhat
heated debate, to an argument or confrontation of moderate intensity, somewhere
between a spirited debate and a fistfight. It employs reduplication, a repeat of one part of the first word in the
second, much like mumbo-jumbo or
another Scots phrase, catter-batter,
meaning to wrangle. Argle-bargle
would typically be used when the speaker is intending to sound either juvenile
or pejorative, take your pick.




