There are two subjects that I really don’t
want to write about. Of course once
you’ve come to that decision, that’s all you seem to think about. Maybe writer's selfblock? The first topic is the South African election
which takes place in just over a week.
Strangely enough, given the history of violent denial of democratic rights here in the past, the election hasn’t generated a great deal of enthusiasm. Only around half the people who, over the last
four years, became eligible to vote for the first time this year have bothered
to register to do so. Probably there is
more interest in whether Hilary Clinton will run in 2016 than in what will
happen here on May 7th. So if
South Africans aren’t very excited about the election, why should outsiders care?
Zuma looking cheerful, as he should |
Nevertheless, there was an interesting report at the
weekend. Our national Sunday newspaper
released a nation-wide poll and the results were surprising. At least to me. They suggest that the African National
Congress (ANC) government will receive pretty much the same percentage of the
votes as they received in the last election.
So what? you ask. Well, the
conventional wisdom here is that the electorate is disgusted with the
government. The president’s shenanigans
with multiple wives (and mistresses) and the widespread corruption – most
recently exposed in a $21 million upgrade of his private residence at state
expense – is decried by all. Desmond
Tutu, who has iconic status in this country, recently said he wouldn’t vote for
the ANC, and so have several ex ministers.
Little has been achieved during the Zuma presidency; people are not
better off (although the fault for that probably lies more with the world
economy than Zuma’s cabinet). Then the
passing of Mandela was supposed to have freed a generation from a sense of
obligation to vote for Madiba’s party.
Yet it seems that old habits die hard if they die at all. It is true that Zuma himself has taken a bit
of a hit. His approval rating has dropped
three points to 62%. 62%? Wow!
Wouldn’t Barack Obama be happy with that sort of rating on a bad day? Zuma must be doing something right. I wish I knew what on earth it is.
This love affair ended in tears |
The predicted tally...sort of |
Given that the ANC will win comfortably,
the only real interest seems to be in who will place. The Democratic Alliance which (in the said conventional wisdom) is seen as a white dominated party looks set to improve
its position to near 25% of the vote, and
firebrand Julius Malema will get less than 1%.
(That surprises me, but it’s a pleasant one.) Agang led by the brilliant Mamphela Ramphele
doesn't do much better. (Not such a pleasant
surprise.) And there’s still a plethora of other new parties touting alternatives to
institutionalized corruption – at least in theory.
All this suggests one of two things. Either people like me – middle-class whites
who think of themselves as mature-age – are totally out of touch with how the
majority of people in the country think (very likely) or the poll is unreliable
because people may lie about their voting intensions, fearing some sort of
reprisal (also pretty likely). I suppose
we will have to wait and see.
The other subject I really don’t want to
write about is the Oscar Pistorius circus.
Stan and I even agreed not to
write about it. So much has been written
already – not only locally but in the international media – that it’s hard to
imagine what more can be said. In case
you are one of the tiny minority which has managed to avoid the story, para-olympian
Pistorius shot and killed his girlfriend – model Reeva Steenkamp – through the
locked door of his bathroom on Valentine’s day last year. He claims to have believed that an intruder
had entered the house through the bathroom window and was about to attack him
and Reeva, who, he believed, was asleep in bed with him. I haven’t followed the case in detail, but
the fact that he shot Reeva is common cause.
The issue is what he believed at the time. If he knew it was her, it was murder. If his story is true, it was at least manslaughter. (Even in South Africa you can’t just shoot at
an unknown and unseen person in the belief that they may intend to attack you.) Of course,
if he actually planned to kill her in advance, it's premeditated murder, but
that seems very unlikely. If this was
the best plan he could come up with, I advise him not to choose a new career in
mystery writing. And between
manslaughter and premeditated murder there is a variety of different offenses.
Prosecutor Nel knows what he believes |
The judge is reputedly doing a good job,
and she will have to decide in the end.
We don’t have a jury system in South Africa, and this seems a pretty good
example of why I believe that is a good thing.
I certainly wouldn’t want to try to unravel this case and make a
decision on Pistorius’ life on the basis of a crash course from the judge on
the relevant law. And I think with her
experience, she will have a better chance than I would of correctly deciding
what was in Pistorius’ mind when he repeatedly pulled the trigger. Maybe the ultimate example of a why-dunnit. We’ll have to wait and see on that one also.
Hopefully I’ll be able to write about
something more interesting in a fortnight.
Of course that will be the day after the election…
Michael - Thursday
Hi Michael: My sister was recently in South Africa and who was sitting behind her in Economy class on the way back to New York? Desmond Tutu! It was one of the highlights of her trip. Hard not to think that O.P. was aware of what he was doing, in anger, perhaps, but still deliberate.
ReplyDeleteWe all seem steeped in writing about what we don't want to write about. I've done a similar thing for Saturday. I guess when in you're in a country attracting so many flies to a subject it's hard to avoid getting caught up in the fly paper. Or something like that. Thanks for the reporting, Michael. The election should make an interesting comparison to the poll.
ReplyDeleteDesmond Tutu is one of only a handful of South Africa's leaders who have maintained their principles and their stature. Mandela, of course, was another. And then...
ReplyDelete