Lake Victoria |
Last week I wrote about David Livingstone and his six
vanished years in search of the source of the Nile. In a comment, Annamaria Alfieri suggested
that the enthusiasm for this particular venture was motivated by Britain’s
concern to control Egypt and thus the Suez Canal. No doubt that’s right. But the issue goes back much further than
that. There is a Latin saying: “Caput
Nili quaerere,” which means “searching for the Nile’s head”. It was used when someone suggested doing
something ridiculous or impossible. It
reminds me of our saying: “You might as well fly to the moon,” which has also
been outdated by technology.
Nile Delta |
Headwaters of the Blue Nile |
Speaking of technology, last week I suggested that a couple
of hours with GoogleEarth is all one needs nowadays to solve these exploration
issues. So I decided to try with the
source of the Nile. Well, it only takes
about fifteen minutes. (It’s fun to do,
but don’t cheat. Turn off all the
borders, roads, photos and the like or it will take you on an obvious tour down
the river.)
Start at the mouth in Cairo
and work upstream from there. It’s
pretty obvious up to Khartoum in Sudan and then there’s a problem. The river splits into two major tributaries,
the White Nile and the Blue Nile. The
Blue, which actually carries the majority of water into the main river as well
as the fertile silt, wends its way from Lake Tana in the highlands of Ethiopia. So is that the source? No, the definition seems to be that the
source is the furthest connected waterway from the mouth. The White Nile is longer, so follow it south
through a huge swampy area in southern Sudan. (Yes, Sudan is like Botswana; very
dry except where it’s wet.) Then it crosses into Uganda and once more splits. The Albert Nile empties from the lakes of the
Great Rift Valley while the White Nile heads east and then south. It exits from Lake Kayoga, which in turn is
fed from Lake Victoria. And that huge
East African lake is to all intents and purposes the source of the Nile. But, of course, one could argue that the
longest river flowing into Lake
Victoria is actually the source. In 1934
a German explorer traced the Kagera river back to the hills of Burundi, and as
recently as 2006 a British and New Zealand party claimed a spot in Rwanda as
the actual source (i.e. that their source was further from Lake Vic than the
German’s). And that wasn’t easy. The 2006 team traveled 4000 miles in 80 days
and one member of the party was killed by rebels.
Dhows on Aswan Dam |
But it was the connection between a great lake and the Nile
that the seventeenth century explorers sought.
A nice, safe water supply for the river, and plenty of accolades at
home.
John Hanning Speke |
In 1856 John Hanning Speke teamed up with Richard Burton
(fresh from his trip to Mecca disguised as an Arab pilgrim) and set out in
search of the source of the Nile. It was
a strange partnership; the men already disliked each other and had very
different personalities – Burton flamboyant and Speke retiring. Their earlier trip together had seen them
both badly injured in Somalia. My guess
is that they went together because each was scared of the other discovering the
source alone! As with all of these
explorations into “darkest” Africa, the trip was horrendous. Both men became ill. Speke went temporary blind and suffered
greatly after trying to remove a beetle from his ear with a knife. They discovered Lake Tanganyika, but Burton
was too weak to continue. Speke went on without
him, discovered Lake Victoria, and declared it – correctly but with no real
evidence – as the source of the Nile.
Richard Burton |
Nile Catchment |
He announced this publicly on returning to England, to
Burton’s fury. On a follow up expedition
in 1860, he sailed the northern coast of Lake Victoria and found the Ripon
Falls pouring water out of the lake.
Although he didn’t follow the water through Somalia, the evidence seemed
conclusive. But Burton was still pushing
the Lake Tanganyika option. (He wasn’t
stupid, at one stage the Albert Nile was indeed fed from that lake, but it was
blocked by volcanic activity in geological times.) Eventually a great debate
was scheduled between the men before the geographical section of the British
Association in Bath on 18 September 1864.
The day before, Speke went bird hunting and, climbing a wall with a
cocked shotgun, killed himself. There
were rumors of suicide, but the wound – below the armpit – made that very
unlikely.
The matter rested in limbo until our friend Henry Stanley of
Livingstone fame confirmed Speke’s discovery in 1875.
Michael – Thursday.
I'm hooked, Michael, and all pumped up for my Google maps expedition. Even have the ear phones hooked up to Beatles' music in homage to Speke's suffering.
ReplyDeleteHooked? Well, there are these thorns called "wag 'n bietjie" which means "wait a bit". And you do...
ReplyDeleteBurton is fascinating, and also a bit off putting for me. I read his "Letters from the Battle-fields of Paraguay" as research for Invisible Country. You have to hand it to him. Wherever you go in the nineteenth century, he's there!
ReplyDelete