All crime fiction
has a protagonist and at least one antagonist. Quite often, the antagonist is the
most interesting character. What makes them do the things they do? Sometimes
our sympathy is with the bad guys at least to some extent. We don’t support
their crimes, but we understand why they feel forced to commit them and wish
there was a way out for them.
Deon Meyer is one of South Africa's top crime writers. I’m a big fan of his Benny Griessel and Vaughn Cupido thrillers, and it’s great news that his latest book, Leo, is now available in the US. Not only is it up to Deon’s usual standard, but this one won the prize for Best Adult Fiction at the South African Book Awards last year and was also SA Book of the Year. Publishers Weekly pigeon-holed it with his usual books, writing, “This intelligent page-turner confirms Meyer’s reputation as a master of the police procedural”.
In fact, Deon’s not so sure this is a police
procedural, and at least half the book is from the viewpoints of the bad guys –
characters engaged in two massive robberies. What’s more, we’re rooting for at
least one of them, Chrissie Jaeger, a woman with a complicated past and unclear
objectives, who is a key player in both heists.
![]() |
Deon Meyer |
In his piece What really defines the subgenres of crime? (https://crimereads.com/deon-meyer-leo/) Deon used a helpful AI system, Claude, and came to this conclusion:
“Leo
probably is heist/caper fiction, amongst other things. But eventually, neither
clever system Claude nor the vast amount of information I gathered during the
interaction, changed my basic philosophy: focus on the story. Make it captivating.
And let other people worry about its place on the ever-extending genre family
tree.”
Fair enough.
In parallel, detectives Griessel and Cupido are trying
to break what seems to be another case altogether. Deon loves parallel plots.
He explains it like this:
“We all write the books we’d like to read, and I love
books with lots of things going on. When I start writing a book and I get these
ideas, I think: it will be cool if they connect. Each must be strong enough and
have a convincing conclusion to be satisfying. You have to be very careful not
to force it and lose credibility. But if it does happen, it can give an extra
little thrill.”
It certainly happens in Leo. Chrissie and her partners discover a stash of money in a
secure warehouse belonging to criminals involved in the South African state capture
corruption, and they set out to steal it. It seems a victimless crime and a
pretty safe one since no one can afford to involve the police. What could
possibly go wrong?
![]() |
Beautiful Stellenbosch mountains where much of Leo is set Photo Deon Meyer |
Some months later, Griessel and Cupido are
investigating the death of a young woman who was biking in the mountains near
Stellenbosch. It seems that her death wasn’t deliberate, but resulted from an
attack by dogs belonging to a jogger who tried to cover it up. Then the jogger
is killed by a professional hit team but no one knows why. His sister suspects
she knows the answer, but wants to keep it to herself and two of her brother’s
associates. As the murders mount, the loop closes, and Chrissie and her team
see the chance of a heist much bigger even than the not-so-successful first one.
![]() |
The escape plane. Or did it? Photo Deon Meyer |
One wants Crissie to get away with her share of the loot so that she can live her dream and retire to her small apartment in an Italian village and help a kind friend there start a restaurant. And she has two stray cats to support. Yes, it’s a crime and yes, people get hurt, but they are not nice people. Deon carefully constructs this ambivalence, leaving it to the reader to decide whether they want to see her caught or not. If you want to find out, you'll have to read the book.
Do you have a favorite antagonist? One you wanted to get away?
No comments:
Post a Comment