Thursday, May 20, 2010
A few years ago South Africa edged out Botswana as having the highest infection rate in the world. Of course, many countries don’t have meaningful statistics but they’ll need to have rates of over 20% to be in the running. So how did the situation get so horribly out of control?
Obviously there have to be a variety of reasons which range from cultural behaviours to poverty and lack of education. But I think that the previous president of South Africa must carry considerable blame. An AIDS denialist, he assembled a “think tank” of alternative medicine practitioners to consider the issue. They blamed poverty and poor nutrition for the symptoms and made scathing remarks about the drug industry and its desire to sell useless chemicals to the poor of Africa. Worse, the minister of health, Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, prescribed beetroot and African potatoes as the way to attack the disease. Embarrassingly, she displayed these vegetables at the South African booth at an international AIDS conference. This lady could be a character in one of our stories. She was expelled from Botswana after being accused of pilfering from her patients at a hospital in Gaborone. She rose through the ranks of the ANC to minister of health, but eventually ruined her liver and, despite a controversial jump-the-queue transplant, moved on to higher things. Angry AIDS activists appealed to the Constitutional Court to force the government to supply retroviral drugs at hospitals and won, but the management wheels turned very slowly.
So what’s the bad news? It’s the size of the problem. Third world governments are making retrovirals available to HIV positive people on the basis of cheaper generics supported by huge grants from charitable foundations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. But even if the rate of new infection falls significantly – and that is mere optimism at the moment – the total number of people infected is growing at a staggering rate. How many circumcisions can realistically take place in the next few years? Anyway, it reduces the chance of infection but certainly doesn’t eliminate it.
And the current sufferers are not cured but remain a drain on medication for the rest of their lives. Thus the demand for the drugs increases daily. In the current economic environment, the cost becomes out of reach for third world countries even with international support. Already there are countries where the drugs are available for free, but you have to join a waiting list – essentially having to wait until someone else no longer "needs" the medication. That is, you have to wait until someone else dies. As the list grows, it seems likely that the people at the bottom, like investors in a pyramid scheme, won’t live long enough to get their turns. It’s a grim scenario.
Michael - Thursday.
at 10:18 AM